Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anti\-seize\s+on\s+lug\s+posts\?\s+$no\s+LBC\s+content$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anti\-seize\s+on\s+lug\s+posts\?\s+$no\s+LBC\s+content$\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:56:24 EDT; I am requesting advice from the well versed among the list. My TR6 is blocked in by my son's Jeep Wrangler, which is immobile until I complete some brake work (the minimal LBC content). I have found; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg00998.html (8,310 bytes)
2. RE: Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:10:31 -0700; white lithium grease seems to work and not loosen Listers, I am requesting advice from the well versed among the list. My TR6 is blocked in by my son's Jeep Wrangler, which is immobile until I comple; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01024.html (8,909 bytes)
3. Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:21:21 -0400; I know the original thread asked for off list responses but I thought, and hoped, others might benefit from my response. Anti seize is a great material which I use often. <--said to hopefully reduce; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01025.html (8,482 bytes)
4. Re: Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:48:18 -0400; And what holds in a lug nut is bolt torque -- the stretching of the stud -- not thread stickiness. -- Martin Secrest 72 TR6 73 GT6 hope; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01026.html (9,009 bytes)
5. Re: Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:16:14 -0400; Rick -- you need to relax a little. Work your shoulders a little. See ... it feels nice, doesn't it? Now that you're feeling better, let me tell you that in my casually jettisoned missive, I didn't m; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01033.html (10,087 bytes)
6. RE: Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:18:51 -0600; I'm puzzled. ??? I did read your original post, didn't have a good answer, and left it to the more knowlegable to reply. I also received Martin's message that you include below. While the informatio; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01034.html (9,383 bytes)
7. RE: Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:25:46 -0700; Martin : I beg to differ, friction is what keeps the nut from spontaneously unscrewing itself. Without friction in the proper places, the entire car falls apart. The stretching of the stud only suppl; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01035.html (8,692 bytes)
8. RE: Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:33:45 -0700; Rick : IMO Martin's reply does constitute "thread drift" (and I disagree with it), but it does seem at least related to the subject of using anti-seize on lug nuts. And, since you've admitted to bei; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01037.html (8,868 bytes)
9. Re: Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:30:07 -0400; But this doesn't explain why my entire cars are always falling apart <g>. I'm sure you're correct. But on a wheel stud -- particularly an American vehicle vs. an LBC -- the torque values are much hi; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01038.html (9,247 bytes)
10. Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:55:22 EDT; Martin's point doesn't seem to me to be a poke or a flame at your good info - simply added clarification - and one I appreciate as I was following this 'lug bolt/ant-seize' topic myself - Martin's p; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01042.html (9,295 bytes)
11. Re: Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:41:07 -0400; Yes Martin torque is involved and stickiness, or lack there of, plays a part also. I think the process may be more accurately conveyed as such: torque would be the force applied to the system to brin; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01049.html (9,001 bytes)
12. Re: Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:44:50 -0400; "And what holds in a lug nut is bolt With MY Triumph, what holds the lug nuts is Happy Thoughts. (I don't care about the scientific reasons. I am just happy when they do what they are supposed to do!; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01050.html (8,567 bytes)
13. Re: Anti-seize on lug posts? (no LBC content) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:13:13 -0400; FWIW, I "reasearched" (heh) this a couple of years ago, because I was worried about overtorqueing the lug bolts on my Audi. The German car's alloys are to be torqued to 90 lb-ft, but I wanted to slat; /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg01058.html (9,083 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]