Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anti\s+sway\s+bar\s+mounting\.\.\s+still\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anti\s+sway\s+bar\s+mounting\.\.\s+still\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Anti sway bar mounting.. still.. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:35:51 -0600; So, because I want to make sure: Were there two types of anti sway bar mounts used on Bugeyes? Was one of the types a simple bar (Or strap) of metal with a big hole in the middle for the spherical jo; /html/spridgets/2006-02/msg00738.html (7,512 bytes)
2. Re: Anti sway bar mounting.. still.. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:20:00 GMT; As I understand it... ...the original Frogeye/Sprite sway bar was an Austin-Healey factory option. The A-frame mounting plate looked almost exactly like the lower front mounting plate for a Wheelrite; /html/spridgets/2006-02/msg00747.html (7,767 bytes)
3. Re: Anti sway bar mounting.. still.. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:26:22 -0600 {sentby:smtp 192.190.246.2 authed with dbl@chicagolandmgclub.com} with any abuse report; IF it became standard, it was after 1972. As of that date it was still an option. Al of the provisions were in place to mount it, but no bar, bushings, or link. David Lieb; /html/spridgets/2006-02/msg00748.html (7,574 bytes)
4. Re: Anti sway bar mounting.. still.. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:02:51 GMT; "IF it became standard..." Right. I was told by other LBC Spridget types that all "later" cars (whatever the hell that means!) shipped into the US came with the 9/16" bar as standard but I sure don't; /html/spridgets/2006-02/msg00750.html (7,189 bytes)
5. Re: Anti sway bar mounting.. still.. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:03:40 -0500; Yes Bugeye optional sway bars were very different from the "later" standard type. Single hole in the A arm mount and a totally different type of bar. Later standard bars used a 3 hole mounting ear bo; /html/spridgets/2006-02/msg00754.html (7,968 bytes)
6. Re: Anti sway bar mounting.. still.. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:08:46 -0500; Anybody have one of the Bugeye bars and mounts for sale? Dave & Bobbie; /html/spridgets/2006-02/msg00757.html (8,161 bytes)
7. Re: Anti sway bar mounting.. still.. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:03:30 -0600; Ok, armed with that info.. without having seen them side by side what will differentiate them? With the length of the arm off the spherical joint i think that I have the earlier type of mount. So hjo; /html/spridgets/2006-02/msg00769.html (8,255 bytes)
8. Re: Anti sway bar mounting.. still.. (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:57:16 GMT; Well...don't know if this will help, but.... considering the way the later (BMC/Leyland) bar is mounted to inward-turned droplinks, it would seem logical to ass-u-me the later bar is shorter than the; /html/spridgets/2006-02/msg00902.html (7,300 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]