- 1. Apologies to Maverick owners everywhere [OT] (score: 1)
- Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 16:15:23 -0800
- A few weeks ago I made a disparaging comment about the Ford Maverick (on the topic of collectable cars). Well, on today's cross-bay jaunt I saw two primo Mavericks, and no LBCs. I don't know what tha
- /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00028.html (7,762 bytes)
- 2. Re: Apologies to Maverick owners everywhere [OT] (score: 1)
- Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 16:43:21 -0800 (PST)
- Max, as a former (and proud!) Maverick owner I debated whether to call you out when you made that comment. I held off because you specifically referred to 4-door Mavericks, which are indeed bizarre-l
- /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00029.html (8,047 bytes)
- 3. Re: Apologies to Maverick owners everywhere [OT] (score: 1)
- Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 20:51:55 -0500
- When I was in college I became the unexpected owner of a Maverick (I think it was a '70, but don't recall for sure anymore). This was because my '72 VW Bug had died (okay, it needed a new spark plug,
- /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00031.html (8,975 bytes)
- 4. Re: Apologies to Maverick owners everywhere [OT] (score: 1)
- Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 05:08:00 -0800 (PST)
- Well, Tab, for most of us, the Maverick was a SMALL car at the time. Our other cars were a '78 Cadillac Sedan de Ville and a '77 Pontiac Bonneville wagon - so the Mav sured seemed small to me! == Dan
- /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00039.html (7,678 bytes)
- 5. Re: Apologies to Maverick owners everywhere [OT] (score: 1)
- Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 11:40:44 -0700
- It was starting to flake, so I rough-sanded it and shot it with red primer, along with most of the hindquarters. The rest of the red paint is so weathered it looks like primer anyway. I had delusions
- /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00118.html (7,904 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu