Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Are\s+MGB\s+reliable\s+daily\s+drivers\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Are\s+MGB\s+reliable\s+daily\s+drivers\?\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Are MGB reliable daily drivers? (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:42:10 -0800; -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it's the primer red one with chrome wires /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool //; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00792.html (8,914 bytes)
22. RE: Are MGB reliable daily drivers? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Vanner" <phil@outtech.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:03:22 -0600; Give that man a Cigar! --Original Message-- Um, what does LBC stand for? Little British Car? Daniel /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool ///; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00794.html (8,631 bytes)
23. Re: Are MGB reliable daily drivers? (score: 1): Author: AOH9999@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 16:50:35 EST; That is a legitimate question. I thought it stood for "Leyland British Car". /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool ///; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00796.html (8,476 bytes)
24. Re: Are MGB reliable daily drivers? (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:03:02 -0500; On Tony Barnhill's http://www.theautoist.com web site he related the story recently of his most recent purchase, a 63 B. A quote from the blurb talking about the previous owner... "He bought her in 1; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00798.html (10,312 bytes)
25. Re: Are MGB reliable daily drivers? (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:57:59 -0600; Since MGs weren't ever Leyland, and only British Leyland after, what, '69. And since Leyland never did anything good for MG... I'll stick with little. -- Paul T. Root E/Mail: proot@iaces.com 600 Stin; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00799.html (8,761 bytes)
26. Re: Are MGB reliable daily drivers? (score: 1): Author: "Murial" <murial@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:14:43 -0600; Would some one please tell orangemgb@juno.com To write Ed K. of J.B. (er?) fame?? Ed has written him a dozen times and gets NO answer?!?!? Thanks. Cindy '73 Black Tulip MBG (Murial) /// /// mgs@autox; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00806.html (8,226 bytes)
27. Re: Are MGB reliable daily drivers? (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.cx>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:03:08 -0800; Someone does: http://www.mgbexperience.com/faq/mgb.html Skye -- 1966 MGB - GHN3L Safety Fast! __,__\__ The MGB Experience www.mgbexperience.com (_o____o_) /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00808.html (8,278 bytes)
28. Re: Are MGB reliable daily drivers? (score: 1): Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:52:09 -0500; Yes. It's one of the neat initial shorthands that listers use. DPO is Dreaded Previous Owner, and there are others too. Perhaps someone has a list of them. Bob On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:31:29 -0700 "Dan; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00809.html (8,255 bytes)
29. Re: Are MGB reliable daily drivers? (score: 1): Author: "Denise Thorpe" <xyzabcde@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 20:19:11 -0500; Hi all, Speaking of mileage, my '67B had 100K on it when I bought it in '79, and it has over 300K now. I'm not sure how many miles over 300K because when I was driving the car from Southern Californi; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00810.html (11,314 bytes)
30. Re: Are MGB reliable daily drivers? (score: 1): Author: <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:32:30 -0000; Leyland's involvement started with British Leyland Motor Cars (1968), then British Leyland, then Leyland Cars. MG was part of the empire of course, and carried the 'plughole' logo on the wings at tim; /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00814.html (8,368 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]