Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Austin\s+Healey\s+100\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Austin\s+Healey\s+100\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: Healeyguy@aol.com; Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 12:40:42 -0500; While I can tolerate many things, listening to (in this case reading) someone rewrite history always seems to get under my skin. The use of the term 100-4 or 100/4 for the early Austin Healey, BN1 a; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00050.html (8,221 bytes)
2. Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "Michael Salter" <michaelsalter@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:33:58 -0500; Dear Mr. Martin, As the owner of two Austin Healey 100s I am astounded to hear that you have never heard anyone call their early Austin Healey a "Healey 100". The Healey 100 was originally so named i; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00055.html (6,947 bytes)
3. RE: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "Quinn, Patrick" <Patrick.Quinn@det.nsw.edu.au>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:10:04 +1100; G'day All An interesting exchange of emails that I thought I would wade into. Very few people on this list have a Healey, plenty of Austin-Healeys but few Healeys. No one on this list has a Healey 10; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00057.html (10,336 bytes)
4. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: Rjdisi@aol.com; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:20:45 EST; Do you know if the designation Austin Healey 100, BN-3/1 was only used in Australia? I've never heard of a 100 with a six cylinder engine which wasn't identified as a 100/Six. I have heard about the; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00058.html (7,752 bytes)
5. RE: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "tom felts" <tomfelts@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:35:25 -0500; Sure glad I have a 3000 and don't have to worry about all those early Participate in Democracy. "In the end, we will not so much remember the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends." Ma; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00059.html (9,575 bytes)
6. RE: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "Quinn, Patrick" <Patrick.Quinn@det.nsw.edu.au>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:33:44 +1100; But there were lots of variations to the six-cylinder cars that never went into production. For such a small company the DHMC was amazingly prolific in its output. Hoo Roo Patrick Quinn Sure glad I; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00060.html (10,332 bytes)
7. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: CAWS52803@aol.com; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:54:00 EST; When I was at Lime Rock Race Track in Connecticut a bunch of years ago, I met a race driver at the Vintage Festival that claimed he had an Austin-Healey 100/Six with a Twin Cam engine. He claims sinc; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00061.html (8,042 bytes)
8. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "HoYo" <hoyo@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:07:11 -0600; THAT /1 !!!!!! HoYo -- Original Message -- From: <Rjdisi@aol.com> To: <Patrick.Quinn@det.nsw.edu.au> Cc: <healeys@Autox.Team.Net> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:20 PM Subject: Re: Austin Healey; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00062.html (8,907 bytes)
9. RE: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "Quinn, Patrick" <Patrick.Quinn@det.nsw.edu.au>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:31:55 +1100; Sounds like someone stuffed a Jaguar engine into the 100/6. I have seen that done a few times over the years. The only other thing it could have been was a car fitted with a Hunter DOHC conversion b; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00064.html (9,558 bytes)
10. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "Charley Braum" <cbaustin@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:05:53 -0500; Boy, I'll bet that guy at the magazine is really happy he got involved in (started?) this thread. I would like to know the basis for his contention that other automobile's public names changed from t; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00068.html (8,675 bytes)
11. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "tom felts" <tomfelts@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 20:36:43 -0500; Damned if I know CB. Who cares--I too busy watching the election results:) <healeys@autox.team.net>; <copyed@sportscarmarket.com> MK Participate in Democracy. "In the end, we will not so much remembe; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00072.html (9,436 bytes)
12. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "Allen C Miller, Jr." <acmiller@mhcable.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:41:35 -0500; I have an Austin Service Manual for the four-cylinder "100" printed in 1959 well into 100-6 production. No refernece to '100-4' even then. I also have circa 1962 Workshop Manual 36201 for six cylinde; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00073.html (8,983 bytes)
13. RE: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "Michael Salter" <michaelsalter@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 22:28:17 -0500; A little fuel for the fire perhaps. The cover of the Driver's Handbook (Part Number AKD3915A) bares the title AUSTIN HEALEY 3000 MKS I AND II and there are several references to Mk I throughout the b; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00075.html (8,864 bytes)
14. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: JH67HEALEY@aol.com; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 22:57:29 EST; I very rarily post on the list but in this case I will. I have been thru every book in my Healey library (123), through every brochure (46) and in none of them is there any reference to the 100/4. Th; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00077.html (9,042 bytes)
15. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "davidwjones" <davidwjones@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:32:31 -0500; I'm laughing, because half the time I pull up anywhere, someone "compliments" me by saying: "Wow!, Nice MG!!" -If they don't know enough to know the difference, I should care? Dave J. . Damned if I k; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00079.html (9,746 bytes)
16. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: Bob Tarwater <btarh2o@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 23:11:51 -0600; I was going to reply to your post and defend the honor of my one owner 1971 MGB-GT until I remembered the day a few years ago when a guy asked me, "what year is your Pinto"? They can't get any worse; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00080.html (8,506 bytes)
17. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "David" <dcrawfor@san.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:11:56 -0800; Too funny! Same thing happens to me. Sometimes I have to look to see which car I'm driving. (not serious) David C '54 BN1 '60 MGA -- Original Message -- From: davidwjones To: tom felts ; Charley Bra; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00081.html (9,234 bytes)
18. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "Chris Dimmock" <cd3000@bigpond.net.au>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:17:52 +1100; And the original Sprite - which is often referred to as the Mark one or bugeye or frogeye............. -- Original Message -- From: "Charley Braum" <cbaustin@verizon.net> To: "Quinn, Patrick" <Patric; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00082.html (8,905 bytes)
19. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: John Peak <redbn7@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 04:09:45 -0800 (PST); I have a reprint of an article from the October, 1971 issue of Autocar that refers to the 100/4. I also have one from the June, 1976 issue of Road & Track that makes the same reference, so clearly th; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00083.html (8,509 bytes)
20. Re: Austin Healey 100 (score: 1): Author: "davidwjones" <davidwjones@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:16:44 -0500; I used to have an MGB-GT when I was in my 20s, (Can't recall the model year, ..but well before the ride height adjustment and the big bumpers). I had more fun with that car than any other I have eve; /html/healeys/2004-11/msg00092.html (8,790 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]