Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Axle\s+bits\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Axle\s+bits\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Axle bits (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:29:38 -0800; If you've got a TR2/3/4/6 send uncle Jack an email now about these front axle bits. They are beautiful parts. I pulled my front axles last night and compared them to the new parts--holy smoke--my ass; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00299.html (7,327 bytes)
2. Re: Axle bits (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:41:23 -0500 (EST); I need a list clarification. I assume that the axle stubs you refer to are the Mark Weathers units... Several of us (myself included) expressed an interest in these parts back in the summer. If we e; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00300.html (7,447 bytes)
3. Re: Axle bits (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:11:03 -0600; These are indeed the Mark Weathers units. Uncle jack just left for a week and a half, so probably won't answer until his return. I'm sure he'll have info on how to order these. I just installed the s; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00301.html (8,750 bytes)
4. RE: Axle bits (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:47:07 -0800; Exactly what I'm talking about. My axles showed fretting in the bearing areas indicating (probably) that despite frequent checking of the bearing preload, that the bearings (especially the inboard on; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00304.html (10,047 bytes)
5. Re: Axle bits (score: 1): Author: "MARK J WEATHERS" <markjwea@email.msn.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:48:15 -0700; Amici, sorry for not communicating well. Everyone who originally ordered the spacer kit, and confirmed that they still wanted it after the price change due to the axle upgrade, is on my order book. I; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00307.html (8,776 bytes)
6. Re: Axle bits (score: 1): Author: Henry Frye <henry@henryfrye.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 19:13:52 -0500; For the benefit of the FOT at large, could you explain what the difference is between the stock hub spacers and the Southwick hub spacers? Is there a reason one spacer design can't be used for both; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00308.html (8,348 bytes)
7. Re: Axle bits (score: 1): Author: "MARK J WEATHERS" <markjwea@email.msn.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 06:55:46 -0700; Amici, here is the explanation of the difference in spacers with the stock hub and the Southwick: Apparently when Uncle Jack and Southwick designed the new hubs, a slightly different bearing set was; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00322.html (10,887 bytes)
8. Re: Axle bits (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:57:04 -0600; Here's my recommendation(s): If you normally run the Southwick hub but carry stock hubs as spares, buy the Southwick version of the kit. If something happens that you need to go to the stock hub, jus; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00323.html (10,656 bytes)
9. Re: Axle bits (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:58:14 -0600; Yes -- please contact Mark Weathers. email address markjweath@email.msn.com uncle jack; /html/fot/2004-02/msg00381.html (7,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]