Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*BCH\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*BCH\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. BCH? (score: 1): Author: thomas_pokrefke@juno.com; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:20:02 EDT; Okay, I surrender. What the hell is a BCH? I'm sure all of you who wanted to know but were too scared to ask appreciate my admission of defeat. Thomas James Pokrefke, III 1970 MGB thomas_pokrefke@jun; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00461.html (7,016 bytes)
2. Re: BCH? (score: 1): Author: bugide@juno.com (Larry Dickstein); Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 21:38:29 EDT; I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed so I asked Bob Allen who knows most everything. He splained it to me, albeit privately. In keeping w/ the family channel of discussion that the adults on this t; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00469.html (8,127 bytes)
3. Re: BCH? (score: 1): Author: Rich Mason <rmason@ro.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 09:34:10 -0500; Thomas Another hint for you...the 'H' stands for hair. And I still contend that RCH is finer! Rich Mason '73 MGB __________________________________________ MG Page-> http://ro.com/~rmason/mgpage.htm; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00485.html (7,329 bytes)
4. Re: BCH? (score: 1): Author: Ross MacPherson <arm@unix.infoserve.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:00:39 -0700; Colour me appreciative.... ___ \______ Ross MacPherson / __ \ __ / /--|) arm@unix.infoserve.net / (___)--/ (___) Vancouver, BC, Canada 1947 MG-TC 3528 1966 MGB-GT; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00496.html (7,199 bytes)
5. Re: BCH? (score: 1): Author: Ross MacPherson <arm@unix.infoserve.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:39:35 -0700; Okay....Okay. By the time I got to this point the penny had dropped. I've used this very term in it's full and colourful form countless thousands of times but never, ever abbreviated it for general u; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00498.html (7,384 bytes)
6. Re: BCH? (score: 1): Author: SPB3430@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 17:45:47 -0400 (EDT); As a setup foreman in a machine shop, we always use the CH measurement scale in adjusting stops on machines. Whenever we have to move a slightly larger distance then the normal CH we usually go a LBO; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00508.html (7,068 bytes)
7. Re: BCH? (score: 1): Author: JstBob@aol.com; Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 11:07:39 -0400 (EDT); of Thats strange we always considered a LBO as a smaller move than the normal CH. As natural blonde is normally finer, but then it could be bleached! Bob, 71 MGB; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00531.html (7,325 bytes)
8. Re: BCH? (score: 1): Author: The English Connection <engconn@pot.infi.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 11:34:55 -0400; As a professional in a machine shop, dealing with the finer points of metals, are you also aware of the Kinnell scale of hardness as applied to metals in the same fashion as is the Rockwell scale? I; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00533.html (8,030 bytes)
9. Re: BCH? (score: 1): Author: bugide@juno.com (Larry Dickstein) (by way of Gregg Baker <gbaker@customcpu.com>); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 10:31:09 -0800; I've only heard of this as RCH because all know that R is the finest measurement in this scale. Baker ThomasI'm not the sharpest tool in the shed so I asked Bob Allen who knows most everything. He sp; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00898.html (7,784 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]