Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*BREAKING\s+NEWS\:\s+New\s+ProSolo\s+Timing\s+System\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*BREAKING\s+NEWS\:\s+New\s+ProSolo\s+Timing\s+System\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:16:13 -0500; I've just had a little conversation with Hisself, and I've got some dope I'm allowed to share: ProSolo is getting a new timing system! Yes, that's right, hell has frozen over and Roger loses the bet.; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00439.html (10,475 bytes)
2. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:35:33 -0500 (EST); ... Who do we need to talk to to ask that ET + RT count in class stuff as well? Otherwise, the whole "careful you don't redlight" part of ProSolo is gone which, IMHO, was a fun part. Don't forget, t; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00442.html (9,222 bytes)
3. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "HEYWARD WAGNER" <h_kenyon@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:47:46 -0500; You mean I spent the off season perfecting my lights for nothing?? Other than that it sounds great! hKw; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00457.html (8,059 bytes)
4. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "HEYWARD WAGNER" <h_kenyon@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:59:11 -0500; Put my name on the list, for the same reasons. hKw; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00458.html (8,456 bytes)
5. RE: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "Randy Chase" <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:18:47 -0800; Assuming you don't make the challenges....yes. :-) This will be a big change. I can see some positives, but unfortunately, we do lose something from the class competition reaction times. However, I; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00460.html (8,820 bytes)
6. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "Bradley H. Lamont" <lamont@mailhost.org>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:40:14 -0600; Doesn't this pretty much remove the "pro" from Prosolo? Why is this being done and what advantage does this offer over the old system? Brad -- Bradley Lamont email: lamont@mailhost.org; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00467.html (8,717 bytes)
7. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:03:08 -0500 (EST); If we assumed that the classes ran with the same et + rt that the challenge will use, the advantage is that you _know_ your reaction time vs. just guess like we used to do. So if I cut a .400 (or a; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00469.html (9,188 bytes)
8. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:47:11 EST; All the people I have spoken too are saying the same thing. It makes no sense to do otherwise except to create confusion; either use it for both class and challenge runs or not at all. Mark Sipe; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00472.html (8,750 bytes)
9. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: Whitneys <whitneys@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:00:09 -0600; As I understand it, that et only result is a hardwired limitation of the drag racing based system. It can do et + rt in the challenges because it uses both to calculate the winning margin, which is c; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00477.html (9,435 bytes)
10. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:46:42 EST; Well I must be ill-informed (which wouldn't be a first) because I fail to understand why et + rt is important for the challenge and not for the class. You have et + rt in heads-up drag racing; how is; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00478.html (10,340 bytes)
11. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:52:22 -0500; AFAIK - and please note that I have NO influence on this at _all_ - this is a function of the new timing system being based on an off-the-shelf drag race timing system. To do otherwise would require; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00480.html (9,603 bytes)
12. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:55:30 -0500 (EST); Like I know anything at all about drag timing systems, but whats the harm in letting it calculate a winning margin during class runs? Its not like you can wear out a processor... :-) To be honest, I; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00481.html (9,694 bytes)
13. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:59:43 -0500 (EST); I for one applaud the effort to add measured rt to the launches as its something that's been missing that would be fun, help drivers improve, give announcers something to talk about, etc. That's rea; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00483.html (10,143 bytes)
14. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:03:13 -0500 (EST); Last I heard, drag racing didn't give out class winner trophies for qualifying. Like it or not, many of us don't expect or will never make the challenge. Why would you want to take the importance of; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00484.html (10,045 bytes)
15. RE: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:14:52 -0500; But as the Challenge is the whole point of the event, that R/T is still pretty damned important. And there's the bonus money for best class comp. R/T too. An Announce Repeater panel (which may or ma; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00486.html (12,040 bytes)
16. RE: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:30:58 -0500 (EST); This is where we fundamentally disagree. The damn Challenge is NOT the whole point of the event. For many/most of us, the challenge is somehting that happens while we're driving back home, happy tha; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00488.html (9,670 bytes)
17. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:06:07 -0500; There's usually bonus money or something for the #1 qualifier. Quite often series points as well. If you win your class, you're probably (almost certainly) going to make the Challenge. If you don't; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00493.html (9,654 bytes)
18. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: Eric Moon <moon-7@blazenet.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:03:19 -0500; Howard, Stan, Dennis, et al: Count me in as part of the camp that would like to see ProSolo continue to use E.T. + R.T. for ALL competitors' runs, not just the Challenge Rounds. ProSolo is marketed t; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00505.html (10,861 bytes)
19. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "Alan Pozner" <apozner@ptd.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:05:11 -0500; I vote for ET+RT in class competition. RT is a lot of the fun in ProSolo. I for one would reconsider spending $55 if RT was out. Regards, Alan reaction light,; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00516.html (9,958 bytes)
20. Re: BREAKING NEWS: New ProSolo Timing System (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:30:37 -0600; Just kinda guessing here, since I don't do a lot of Pro Solo (but as motorsport journalist I have some understanding of how drag racing works) -- it seems part of the problem stems from one of a coup; /html/autox/2001-01/msg00520.html (15,263 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]