- 1. Babygrands [Was : Spridgets in DP] (score: 1)
- Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 17:30:35 -0700
- Okay, fair enough. Does this help? http://www.babygrandracing.com/rules.htm No, I'm not trying to be a smart ass, just helpful. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONI
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00149.html (8,270 bytes)
- 2. Re: Babygrands [Was : Spridgets in DP] (score: 1)
- Author: "Kendall F Jones" <mrjones2@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 19:49:28 -0700
- Wow, all those caps make my head hurt. Why is the rulebook shouting?? I still think that someone could develop a solo only BG and kick all our butts. The SCCA should (at the very least) summarize in
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00150.html (7,820 bytes)
- 3. Re: Babygrands [Was : Spridgets in DP] (score: 1)
- Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 18:13:53 -0700
- Don't take this personally, but I kinda like the Babygrands. :-) Sortof like a D or C sports racer clothed in a NASCAR look alike body. I'm not in favor of promoting overdog cars though. And I don't
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00153.html (8,439 bytes)
- 4. Re: Babygrands [Was : Spridgets in DP] (score: 1)
- Author: "Kendall F Jones" <mrjones2@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 20:37:20 -0700
- I dunno - I guess I'm not dead set against them (I did think it was kinda cool to kick Jeff Gordon's ass - sort of). I'm just worried about the rules. I think a truly balanced car may not need a LSD.
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00155.html (7,217 bytes)
- 5. Re: Babygrands [Was : Spridgets in DP] (score: 1)
- Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 20:24:24 -0600
- I think that can be easilly controlled. It's not dissimilar to accepting cars such as Formula Ford, Formula Vee, and other such very spec'd cars into Solo2 categories. I would assume for the most par
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00162.html (8,230 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu