Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bad\s+Temp\s+sender\s+part\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bad\s+Temp\s+sender\s+part\s+II\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Bad Temp sender part II (score: 1): Author: "E.Claure" <spanlab@ceibo.entelnet.bo>; Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 06:41:52 -0800; Hi list, I warmed the sender up outside of the car while connecting my ohm meter. The more heat the lower the resistance. I guess this means it works. So, sender is fine, gauge is fine, I can't think; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00128.html (7,086 bytes)
2. RE: Bad Temp sender part II (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:50:19 -0700; Enrique, how about testing the continuity of the wire from the sender to the Larry; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00129.html (7,736 bytes)
3. Re: Bad Temp sender part II (score: 1): Author: JustBrits@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 20:22:22 EST; << Part is 2-713 as specified in myVB catalog for the years 77-80. >> "Key" part of that sentence is (IMHO): "...VB...". Ed; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00135.html (7,077 bytes)
4. Re: Bad Temp sender part II (score: 1): Author: Gonaj@aol.com; Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 07:28:14 EST; Now do the same experiment with the part installed in the car. That will test the connection to the block. Only other thought is that it may, due to some fault, have become position sensitive and alt; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00153.html (7,029 bytes)
5. Re: Bad Temp sender part II (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 16:53:36 -0600; I measured the resistance of the sender in my '69 B. It's 61 Ohms at an ambienr temp of ~70 degrees F. Don't know what the later one should read. If I was going to test yours, I'd find out what it's; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00164.html (7,254 bytes)
6. RE: Bad Temp sender part II (score: 1): Author: Duinhoven_Hans@emc.com; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 02:06:29 -0500; Agree with Larry, if there is a temp. broken wire, it sometimes makes contact intermittently. Bypassing with a test wire direct to the gauge may tell the truth about this. Also mentioned by another l; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00197.html (8,438 bytes)
7. RE: Bad Temp sender part II (score: 1): Author: Duinhoven_Hans@emc.com; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 02:26:13 -0500; Most pots would not survive with this amount of current! be warned. Cheers, Hans Enrique, I measured the resistance of the sender in my '69 B. It's 61 Ohms at an ambienr temp of ~70 degrees F. Don't; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00198.html (7,550 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]