Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ballast\s+Resistor\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ballast\s+Resistor\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. ballast resistor (score: 1): Author: "John & Diane Voice" <drjev@dccnet.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:13:18 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time); Hello Listers, Does anybody know of a replacement ballast resistor that will fit into the original housing? ...or... if not, does anyone have a working one that they are willing to sell.? If you have; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00172.html (7,027 bytes)
2. RE: ballast resistor (score: 1): Author: "Dan Fitzgerald" <daniel63@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:35:26 -0400; You can purchase a new ballast resistor that is identical to the original from National Parts Depot, 1955-1957 Thunderbird Parts catalog, Part # T-12250-1A, cost $21.95. Dan B9470033; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00186.html (7,038 bytes)
3. RE: ballast resistor (score: 1): Author: "John & Diane Voice" <drjev@dccnet.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:38:34 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time); Thanks to the many listers who responded to our question. We have now ordered from NPD. Never ceases to amaze me at all the help available through this list. Great for keeping our old cars in top con; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00187.html (7,317 bytes)
4. RE: ballast resistor (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:46:31 -0400; I just checked the parts manual. The original Ford part number for the ballast resistor is B7A-12250-A. Ron Fraser Thanks to the many listers who responded to our question. We have now ordered from; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00190.html (7,925 bytes)
5. RE: ballast resistor (score: 1): Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:55:09 -0700 (PDT); Ron and John- Ron your number is an orginal Ford parts number. Made in 1967 and John the number you are referencing is Nationals part number. The part is identical in appearance, just probablly not a; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00191.html (7,149 bytes)
6. RE: ballast resistor (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:04:11 -0400; B7 = 1957 so the 57 T-bird part should be correct in all respects. I find that having the original Ford part number can save a lot of time searching for a part. Ron Fraser Ron and John- Ron your num; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00192.html (7,805 bytes)
7. RE: ballast resistor (score: 1): Author: "Norman C. Miller" <rootes1@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:53:29 -0700; Anyone who thinks these two ducks are identical - quacks. http://www.geocities.com/jds_johnson/bal_compar.jpg JD; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00201.html (7,120 bytes)
8. Re: Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: Greg <hd_rider@uclink4.berkeley.edu>; Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 00:56:06 -0700; I am looking to replace my ballast resistor on my Mark II .It is a Ford part but the local classic Ford parts shop does not recognize it. Can anyone help me. I found a generic one from a parts shop a; /html/tigers/2003-10/msg00001.html (6,814 bytes)
9. Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: "Rhodes, A. (Alan)" <Alan.Rhodes@Twaron.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:57:53 +0200; I am looking to replace my ballast resistor on my Mark II .It is a Ford part but the local classic Ford parts shop does not recognize it. Can anyone help me. Thanks Alan Rhodes Alan Rhodes Technical; /html/tigers/2003-09/msg00122.html (6,594 bytes)
10. Re: Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:43:50 -0700; The Ford part number is listed in the http://www.TigersUnited.com "Rootes Resources" section, "Rootes Tiger Parts List", which is the official Rootes list of all Tiger parts. Part numbers are given,; /html/tigers/2003-09/msg00124.html (7,243 bytes)
11. Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: CE25593@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 23:34:24 EDT; I am in the process of rewiring my Tiger with a Peerless system I am seeking guidance on the ballast resistor. Is it truly necessary? I've seen some Tigers with one, and some without. I will be runni; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00372.html (7,025 bytes)
12. Re: Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@home.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:36:54 -0600; It depends on the coil you're using. If you're using a stock or stock coil then you need a ballast resistor. If you're using one of the high-performance aftermarket coils then they may say specifical; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00373.html (7,376 bytes)
13. RE: Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:55:41 -0700; Coils for most European cars are designed to run at full voltage; i.e., no ballast resistor. I picked one for a BMW that had the right dimensions and appearance. I can look up the part number if you; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00374.html (7,089 bytes)
14. Re: Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:53:32 -0700; Bob, If you are using the original Pertronix, you MUST use THE ballast resistor that comes with, or meant for, the "points type" ignition coil, and that coil. If you are running the Pertronix II, you; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00379.html (8,488 bytes)
15. RE: Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:38:41 -0700; I was counting on you to provide this guidance on the Pertronix, as you have previously on this subject. I would only add just a point of clarification on "hot" 12V coils. A 12V coil is not necessar; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00380.html (10,049 bytes)
16. Re: Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: "Stu Brennan" <stubrennan@mediaone.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:17:30 -0400; The stock ignition system shorts out the ballast resistor to provide a hotter spark when the starter is dragging the system voltage down. Do these "12V" coils have a similar feature? Or are they so "; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00381.html (7,275 bytes)
17. Re: Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:17:31 -0700; Stu, That explanation of the ballast resistor is a little off. Yes, in the "start position" the resistor is by-passed and a full 12 volts is applied to the coil during cranking only. This provides a; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00382.html (9,422 bytes)
18. RE: Ballast Resistor (score: 1): Author: "Palmer, Robert L." <RPalmer@brobeck.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:52:41 -0700; On a cold winter's morning in Nebraska, the ballast resistor setup might help. However, I agree with Steve, and all European auto manufacturers, that even with the reduced cranking voltage there is; /html/tigers/2001-09/msg00383.html (11,908 bytes)
19. ballast resistor (score: 1): Author: Jim Parent <jimparent@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 09:53:40 -0400; Now I'm confused on a different subject. While reading all the great information about the starter solinoid I ran across the following: t I put a Mallory unilite distributor in my 302 in place of my; /html/tigers/1997-08/msg00165.html (7,462 bytes)
20. Re: ballast resistor (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 09:24:25 +0100; Yes, the resistor is to limit voltage to the 9 volt coil. It only uses 12 volts during start-up. A short term overload. The "breakers", be they points or electronic, really don't care if they are sw; /html/tigers/1997-08/msg00167.html (8,120 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]