- 1. Re: Barrett Jackson...NOT! :-) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:12:00 EST
- that So would I in that case. But my comment was not aimed at the B-J auction, only at a broader generalization that happened to appear in an e-mail still carrying the "auction" subject line. But to
- /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg00693.html (8,276 bytes)
- 2. RE: Barrett Jackson...NOT! :-) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:41:48 -0500
- Andy Mace wrote: But for the vast majority of us, we would effectively be working for ourselves for pennies an hour and/or eat up most or all potential profit in whatever work we would have to "subco
- /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg00711.html (9,405 bytes)
- 3. RE: Barrett Jackson...NOT! :-) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:02:56 -0500
- I respectfully have to submit that any positive figure is probably erroneous. The truth is that any minute I have taken to work on my Triumph could equally have been spent doing many things that woul
- /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg00714.html (8,216 bytes)
- 4. Re: Barrett Jackson...NOT! :-) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:15:00 -0700 (MST)
- I am still of the opinion that in most cases, the old saying applies that the best way to make a small fortune restoring LBC's is to start out with a large one. A lot would depend on what kind of car
- /html/triumphs/2003-01/msg00796.html (7,449 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu