Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Battery\s+Rating\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Battery\s+Rating\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Battery Rating? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 07:40:49 -0500; Hi List! I'm just jumping in on this thread , quite late :-[ I admit. I'm new to this language of 'group rating' on batteries. I just purchased a battery this past summer rated @ 875 Cold Cranking (C; /html/triumphs/2002-11/msg00003.html (6,964 bytes)
2. Re: Battery Rating? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 06:55:14 -0600; Group number refers to size and post orientation. It has nothing to do with power rating. Michael /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archive; /html/triumphs/2002-11/msg00006.html (7,481 bytes)
3. RE: Battery Rating? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 08:58:22 -0800; Exactly. Except to the extent that, other things being equal, physically larger batteries usually have more capacity. There's a fairly complete listing of all the 'group' sizes at http://www.exidebat; /html/triumphs/2002-11/msg00013.html (7,374 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]