Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Battery\s+Up\s+Front\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Battery\s+Up\s+Front\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Battery Up Front? (score: 1): Author: "Tim Economu" <economu@whidbey.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 21:15:42 -0800; AGM batteries actually have lower internal resistance which allows them to accept more charge (and discharge currents). They are very high performance lead acid batteries, but you will pay much more; /html/mgs/2001-02/msg00149.html (6,849 bytes)
2. Battery Up Front? (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:36:38 -0500; There's a picture of the engine compartment of a 64 B... http://www.british-cars.org.uk/kimber/pics/neuhaus3.jpg Described as... Engine bay with 2-litre-engine, built by Brown & Gammons in 1982. 106; /html/mgs/2001-01/msg01105.html (7,855 bytes)
3. Re: Battery Up Front? (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:37:09 -0800 (PST); Hmmm, wonder why they put the battery there? Just to shorten the cables? I would think that this would upset the delicate handling balance of our cars!! == Dan DiBiase Dayton, NJ '76 MGB Tourer - Bro; /html/mgs/2001-01/msg01112.html (6,874 bytes)
4. Re: Battery Up Front? (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:11:11 -0800; Why would you want the battery up front? The current location, extremely low and amidships, is almost ideal from a weight distribution standpoint. Why move it forward and above the CG? -- Max Heim '6; /html/mgs/2001-01/msg01129.html (8,608 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]