Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Best\s+approach\s+to\s+add\s+breather\s+system\.\.\.\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Best approach to add breather system...? (score: 1)
Author: "Pete Bronlund" <peteb@clear.net.nz>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 11:18:51 +1200
Hi there folks. I know that i must remove the blow-by gases from the crankcase of my reco'd Rover 3.5liter (or suffer chance of expensive damage in a backfire) but since i'm using a 390 Holley what a
/html/buick-rover-v8/2001-08/msg00009.html (7,479 bytes)

2. Re: Best approach to add breather system...? (score: 1)
Author: "bown" <bown@concentric.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 23:38:57 -0600
I am also running a Holley 390 on one of my Buick 215s. I have a PCV in one rocker cover that plumbs into the 3/8" connector hole in the Holley base. The other rocker cover has a vented oil filler c
/html/buick-rover-v8/2001-08/msg00011.html (8,538 bytes)

3. Re: Best approach to add breather system...? (score: 1)
Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 17:56:38 -0700
Jim et al, The system you describe here is exactly the way it has been done since the beginning. The only major change since 1961 or so, when these systems first came into use, is that air ENTERING
/html/buick-rover-v8/2001-08/msg00017.html (9,883 bytes)

4. Re: Best approach to add breather system...? (score: 1)
Author: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:14:53 +1000
One other disadvantage of the draft tube was the dropping of oil (that had condensed from oil vapour?) onto the roadway. Ron Beckett, J.P. Emu Plains, Australia 1986 Range Rover HiLine Auto 4.6 Litre
/html/buick-rover-v8/2001-08/msg00018.html (7,722 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu