- 1. Better Use of Ethanol (non LSR) (score: 1)
- Author: Bobbyhotrods@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:31:43 +0000
- http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2006/engine.html
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00522.html (6,757 bytes)
- 2. Re: Better Use of Ethanol (non LSR) (score: 1)
- Author: Higginbotham Land Speed Racing <saltrat@lubricationdynamics.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:32:14 -0700
- Good idea but not much different than ADI systems on fighter engines in WWII.
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00523.html (7,097 bytes)
- 3. Re: Better Use of Ethanol (non LSR) (score: 1)
- Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@wildblue.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:40:49 -0700
- You still see the ADI truck running around today at the Reno Air Races. I would prefer a 2L TDI Diesel, with water injection that could produce 40 to 50 psi intake charge pressure. 300+ HP and 50 mp
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00526.html (7,262 bytes)
- 4. Re: Better Use of Ethanol (non LSR) (score: 1)
- Author: Skip Higginbotham <Saltrat@lubricationdynamics.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:58:58 -0700
- I agree Bryan....could add a little propane to it too! 2007 diesel is supposed to have almost no sulfur in it, I hear. Skip
- /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00527.html (7,342 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu