Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Better\s+brakes\?\s+\-0400\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Better\s+brakes\?\s+\-0400\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Better brakes? -0400 (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:15:46 -0400 (EDT); I obviously misunderstood! :) Cap'n. Bob '60 :{) /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.n; /html/spridgets/2002-06/msg00492.html (6,763 bytes)
2. Re: Better brakes? -0400 (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:28:43 -0400 (EDT); Agree with you whole heartedly, Chris K., The first time you initially hit the stock discs after driving for a period of time in really wet weather, they are not exactly at their best until the water; /html/spridgets/2002-06/msg00495.html (7,319 bytes)
3. Re: Better brakes? -0400 (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:11:33 -0400 (EDT); I agree with you about being cautious in contaminated conditions (type of disc used notwithstanding) but quick "drain" of water is the only advantage I personally see in using drilled rotors on the; /html/spridgets/2002-06/msg00524.html (7,240 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]