Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Big\s+Bore\s+Kits\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Big\s+Bore\s+Kits\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Big Bore Kits (score: 1): Author: Richard Taylor <n196x@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 08:34:39; Fellow FOTers, I recently located an old clapped-out TR-4 motor to re-build for my '66 street-legal/vintage racing Triumph. In the great American tradition, my first thought is that the road to power; /html/fot/1997-07/msg00017.html (7,659 bytes)
2. RE: Big Bore Kits (score: 1): Author: Alexander Joseph H <AlexanderJosephH@Waterloo.deere.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 08:58:24 -0500; Hi Richard, This sounds very familiar to us. We ran an engine very near to stock the first couple years. Our initial focus was to build a car from the ground up paying particular attention to what ev; /html/fot/1997-07/msg00018.html (10,208 bytes)
3. RE: Big Bore Kits (score: 1): Author: Chip Bond <spirals@esinet.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 10:21:44 -0400; Most vintage groups would like you to stay with an 87mm bore, and SCCA requires that. This is only a 1mm increase over the stock TR4 motor but does aid compression and displacement a small amount. I; /html/fot/1997-07/msg00019.html (9,521 bytes)
4. Re: Big Bore Kits (score: 1): Author: R John Lye <rjl6n@uva.pcmail.virginia.edu>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 97 13:29:16 EDT; Hi all, Some random thoughts before getting back to work after our trip to the Dallas sweatfest... Tha certainly helps. That really depends on the answer to: Optimum for what? For sheer horsepower, I; /html/fot/1997-07/msg00021.html (9,577 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]