Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Black\s+\"evaporation\"\s+tank\s+in\s+trunk\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Black\s+\"evaporation\"\s+tank\s+in\s+trunk\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Black "evaporation" tank in trunk (score: 1): Author: "Allen Blackmon" <orangedawg@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 18:55:50 +0000; I have a 1970, de-smogged 2000. can I remove that black tank in my trunk? What "fuel" lines can I eliminate, if any? Thanks! Allen _________________________________________________________________ Jo; /html/datsun-roadsters/2002-03/msg00926.html (7,022 bytes)
2. Re: Black "evaporation" tank in trunk (score: 1): Author: Adam Bradley <ambradley@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:10:14 -0800 (PST); No and none, not without redesigning the system. The fuel return and the smog pump are not connected. Nor is the distributor, but that's another story. The '70 fuel system is closed, thus the non-ven; /html/datsun-roadsters/2002-03/msg00929.html (7,931 bytes)
3. Re: Black "evaporation" tank in trunk (score: 1): Author: "John F Sandhoff" <sandhoff@csus.edu>; Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:28:53 -0800; Not to be argumentative, but... why? The vapor recovery system doesn't hurt performance, doesn't hurt mileage, doesn't add significant weight, and _may_ actually do a bit of overall good. So why not; /html/datsun-roadsters/2002-03/msg00931.html (7,107 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]