Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Block\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Block\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Block (score: 1): Author: "Larry & Sandi Miller" <millerls@ado13.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 17:28:04 -0700; Does anybody know of a sure fire way to identify a 1098 block? It had a 948 head on it and it has the side covers but it does not have the fuel pump hole. It looks like there is a place for a tag to; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01568.html (8,063 bytes)
2. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: "D. Michael Scott" <dms@snip.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 21:56:16 -0400; Maybe I'm over-simplifying here, but a 1098 is a long block and a 948 is a short block. I have a 948cc. I think both use the mechanical fuel pump as original, though a 1098 owner may give you more in; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01571.html (8,993 bytes)
3. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: "Larry & Sandi Miller" <millerls@ado13.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 20:07:53 -0700; Thanks for all the answers. 1. It has side covers. 2. No hole for a fuel pump. But there is a hole with a screw in it about where the left hand stud for the pump would be. 3. It has a bump to the lef; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01574.html (9,427 bytes)
4. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: Gerard Chateauvieux <pixelsmith@gerardsgarage.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 02:04:01 -0700; 1098's had aluminum tags too, stamped "1100". The tag is mounted just forward of the fuel pump location. As I recall, they can be found with both the opening for the fuel pump and also with the casti; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01579.html (11,137 bytes)
5. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: "Wiedemeyer" <boxweed@thebest.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 10:30:36 -0400; If all that stuff that usually identifies the engine is missing, then you can check the cylinder diameter, which, if it's a 1098cc engine, should be 64.58mm. If it's considerably larger than that, th; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01590.html (10,214 bytes)
6. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: "Peter C." <nosimport@mailbag.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 09:44:19 -0500; And if it proves to be a 1098..... decide if early 10CG with 1.75" mains or later 10CC with 2" Peter C; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01595.html (11,040 bytes)
7. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: "Larry & Sandi Miller" <millerls@ado13.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 08:54:14 -0700; The block is in fact a 10CC big main 1098 block. Larry Miller -- Original Message -- From: Peter C. <nosimport@mailbag.com> To: Wiedemeyer <boxweed@thebest.net>; Larry & Sandi Miller <millerls@ado13.; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01597.html (11,558 bytes)
8. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: Paul A Asgeirsson <pasgeirsson@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 19:37:47 EDT; 948 blocks have "950" cast into the side, 1098 blocks have a boss where a "1098" aluminum tag is nail/riveted on. Paul PAsgeirsson@juno.com; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01635.html (9,121 bytes)
9. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 10:39:24 +1000; There was a "cheatin' dog" trick pulled by someone who will remain nameless (except he was from NSW) Build up a false '948' on the side of an 1100 block with coat hanger wire and epoxy. Paint over th; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01645.html (10,203 bytes)
10. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: Gerard Chateauvieux <pixelsmith@gerardsgarage.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 19:54:17 -0700; Now that's some creative racing... If you can stay calm, while all around you is chaos... then you probably haven't completely understood the seriousness of the situation. G G Gerard Chateauvieux E A; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01654.html (11,401 bytes)
11. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: Richard Shipman <mbelect@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 10:37:43 -0400; When I do that, I use '950' instead of '948'... a little less obvious that way! Richard; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01675.html (8,521 bytes)
12. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: JustBrits@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 10:53:50 EDT; << When I do that, I use '950' instead of '948'... a little less obvious that way! >> ROTFLMAO, Richard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! Cheers.....; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01677.html (7,789 bytes)
13. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 09:26:03 +1000; OK, you're right - it was/is 950 on the side of the block, not 948. The cheater used the correct "950" - the error in my posting is a result of my imperfect memory or sub-par, morning mental processe; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01730.html (9,252 bytes)
14. Re: Block (score: 1): Author: JustBrits@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 20:08:22 EDT; << ...morning... >> Geez, whom did we "bury" this afternoon?? Enquiring min...........NAH<G>!! ED; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01734.html (7,491 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]