Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Boat\s+US\s+recognition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Boat\s+US\s+recognition\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Boat US recognition (score: 1): Author: <INSPTWO@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:28:13 -0400; Once again, people are recognizing that the Healey is a true classic! In the September issue of Boat U.S., Jim Ellis was writing about racing with the Stars and Heros in the Antiqua Classic Yacht Reg; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00425.html (7,445 bytes)
2. Re: Boat US recognition (score: 1): Author: "davidwjones" <davidwjones@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:17:34 -0400; Once again, people are recognizing that the Healey is a true classic! In the September issue of Boat U.S., Jim Ellis was writing about racing with the Stars and Heros in the Antiqua Classic Yacht Reg; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00426.html (7,772 bytes)
3. Re: Boat US recognition (score: 1): Author: "Bob Spidell" <bspidell@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:38:53 -0700; Pretty satisfying to see our 38+ year-old Beasts are still setting the standard. bs ** Bob Spidell San Jose, CA bspidell@comcast.net '67 Austin-Healey 3000 '56 Austin-Healey 100M **; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00429.html (8,468 bytes)
4. Re: Boat US recognition (score: 1): Author: "Alex" <alexmm@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:12:48 -0400; == Alex in Maine 1960 BT7 3000 Mark 1 - "The Blue Mainie" Former owner of 1957 100-6, and 1967 3000 Mark III BJ8 http://users.adelphia.net/~alexmm/ai2q.htm I wonder why "1960" ?; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00433.html (7,341 bytes)
5. Re: Boat US recognition (score: 1): Author: tammie wall <whammie@iopener.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 04:57:36 -0500; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00439.html (8,118 bytes)
6. Re: Boat US recognition (score: 1): Author: N5572B@aol.com; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:12:46 EDT; I wonder why "1960" ? Why not 60? It also fits neatly between the Gullwing (55 although not mentioned by year) and the 65 Mustang...yes, he said 64 but there are NO 64 Mustangs, they are 65, they wer; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00449.html (7,255 bytes)
7. Re: Boat US recognition (score: 1): Author: "tom felts" <tomfelts@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:19:10 -0400; He actually meant to say 65 Healey to coincide with the 65 Mustang.:) 64; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00460.html (7,900 bytes)
8. Re: Boat US recognition (score: 1): Author: "davidwjones" <davidwjones@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:34:57 -0400; Hey, Hey, HEY !!!!! -Nothing against 1960... Just that no year was specified for the other two cars, and frankly, most people wouldn't know the difference between a 59 and a 67 Healey..... or a 54 an; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00461.html (8,041 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]