Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bombing\s+of\s+Coventry\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bombing\s+of\s+Coventry\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Bombing of Coventry (score: 1): Author: "Paul Richardson" <Paul-Richardson@cyberware.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 10:47:07 -0000; the was The Bombing of Coventry was very heavy and one of the heaviest raids was on Nov 14 1940 when the cathedral was reduced to rubble all but the 303ft high steeple and a few outer walls. There wa; /html/fot/1999-11/msg00064.html (12,846 bytes)
2. Re: Bombing of Coventry (score: 1): Author: Scott Fisher <sefisher@cisco.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 11:01:21 -0800; I'm probably safe in speaking for anyone on this list when I say that you have not only our explicit permission to ramble thus, but our rapt attention when you do so. I'm sure I'm not the only person; /html/fot/1999-11/msg00071.html (7,651 bytes)
3. RE: Bombing of Coventry (score: 1): Author: Jack Wheeler <jwheeler@robus.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 14:13:00 -0500; I'm probably safe in speaking for anyone on this list when I say that you have not only our explicit permission to ramble thus, but our rapt attention when you do so. I'm sure I'm not the only perso; /html/fot/1999-11/msg00072.html (7,867 bytes)
4. Re: Bombing of Coventry (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@AOL.COM; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 15:38:18 EST; << Here, Here!! >> PAUL; SCOTT; JACK; HEAR, HERE! Bill Dentinger; /html/fot/1999-11/msg00073.html (7,067 bytes)
5. Re: Bombing of Coventry (score: 1): Author: "jonmac" <jonmac@ndirect.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 21:46:52 -0000; Coventry whereby factory or he organized a could be moved There's another angle on that as well, Paul. Quite apart from creating a system whereby machine tools could be moved at short notice, Black a; /html/fot/1999-11/msg00075.html (7,884 bytes)
6. Re: Bombing of Coventry (score: 1): Author: "Bill Sohl" <billsohl@smtp.interactive.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 09:33:08 +0000; Here here! I couldn't agree more with Scott's sentiments. Too many people tofay have no sense at all of the sacrifices so many people made so we can have the enjoyment of all those things we do now.; /html/fot/1999-11/msg00080.html (8,101 bytes)
7. Re: Bombing of Coventry (score: 1): Author: Patrick McMullen <pmcmull@ibm.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 16:50:03 -0500; Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the later Spitfires could actually fly higher than the German ME-262 jets of the time. Supercharging was indeed very important during WWII. As a mater of fact,; /html/fot/1999-11/msg00082.html (7,586 bytes)
8. Re: Bombing of Coventry (score: 1): Author: Catpusher@AOL.COM; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 17:05:30 EST; Jolly good thing that the Allies did not have a second place finish!; /html/fot/1999-11/msg00084.html (6,814 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]