- 1. RE: Bonneville plans (score: 1)
- Author: "White, J D III" <J.White@cptbelts.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:11:30 -0400
- Keith, Do you think you could wait to run the C/F motor until World Finals, or at least cut three or four spark plug wires to level up the playing field? I think we might get our car running on at le
- /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00178.html (7,637 bytes)
- 2. Re: Bonneville plans (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 23:47:39 -0500
- Jack... I'm kind of doubting much sand bagging on this one... we've already set the record at 251mph or so only to loose it to a paper work snafu... I'm fairly sure if all goes well we'll be running
- /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00183.html (8,294 bytes)
- 3. Re: Bonneville plans (score: 1)
- Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 07:15:45 -0400
- And why not a "B" motor?
- /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00184.html (7,466 bytes)
- 4. Re: Bonneville plans (score: 1)
- Author: DaCudaKid@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 07:49:47 EDT
- Might be an advantage in having a killer B.
- /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00185.html (6,963 bytes)
- 5. Re: Bonneville plans (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 11:11:04 -0500
- The Berkeley isn't capable of having a big block yet... it would require way to many modifications, so if someone doesn't choose to run against it my recommendation is an A or AA motor... ( kinda har
- /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00187.html (7,160 bytes)
- 6. RE: Bonneville plans (score: 1)
- Author: "White, J D III" <J.White@cptbelts.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 20:14:44 -0400
- You're right, definitely no sand bagging on this. We are running what I would consider a little better than late 80's sprint car motor technology. Last year was our first attempt at running anything
- /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00190.html (9,210 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu