Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Brake\s+fluid\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Brake\s+fluid\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Brake fluid (score: 1): Author: Allen Washatko <awashatko@wi.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:06:50 -0600; What's the best brake fluid to run these days? Wilwood Hi-Temp 570, Wilwood Exp 600 Plus, Motul 600, Castrol SRF (expensive)? Thanks for any suggestions. Allen; /html/fot/2003-03/msg00356.html (6,435 bytes)
2. Re: Brake fluid (score: 1): Author: Chuck Arnold <chuck.arnold@oracle.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:28:56 -0800; I saw a comparison of temps these all handle. Seems like the Motul is the best price/perfomace option. Chuck [demime 0.99d.1 removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of chuck.arnol; /html/fot/2003-03/msg00360.html (6,830 bytes)
3. Re: Brake fluid (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 18:24:55 -0600; haven't experienced any problems along that line in my race car since I began using AP 551. Available in several race catalogs (just got three from Racer Wholesale) --rocky Wilwood; /html/fot/2003-03/msg00371.html (6,914 bytes)
4. Brake Fluid (score: 1): Author: EPRacer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 22:17:31 EDT; I want to ask if anyone has used Castrol SRF brake fluid? I have been using AP550, but want to kick the dry boiling point up a notch. Is there any problem with seal life? I see SRF at the CART and A; /html/fot/2002-08/msg00132.html (6,243 bytes)
5. Brake fluid (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@forbin.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 16:23:07 -0600; I'm going to copy a note from a member of the other list, to members of FOT. I too am curious about DOT 4 vs DOT 5. I used Castrol LMA and saw the black stuff coming up from the hole connecting the T; /html/fot/1996-12/msg00041.html (7,826 bytes)
6. Brake Fluid (score: 1): Author: Patrick McMullen <mcmullen@isnet.is.bgsm.edu>; Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 18:51:55 -0800; I think the biggest disadvantage to DOT 5 is its compressability at higher temperatures. This is why most people in the racing world do not use DOT 5. There are several warnings about using DOT 5 in; /html/fot/1996-12/msg00042.html (6,898 bytes)
7. Re: Brake fluid (score: 1): Author: cak@dimebank.com (Chris Kantarjiev); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 13:04:11 -0800; Here is my basic rant about DOT4 vs DOT5 - it's from a racing/high performance slant, not concours or preservation. If you don't want to read through it all, there's a summary at the end. An even ter; /html/fot/1996-12/msg00043.html (10,104 bytes)
8. Re: Brake fluid (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@forbin.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 17:00:29 -0600; Thanks for the info. I'm even going to save it. I did not know that DOT was the designation for silicone fluid; /html/fot/1996-12/msg00044.html (6,663 bytes)
9. Re: Brake fluid (score: 1): Author: cak@dimebank.com (Chris Kantarjiev); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 15:29:30 -0800; Thanks for the info. I'm even going to save it. I did not know that DOT was the designation for silicone fluid You're welcome. But if you think that DOT5 means silicone fluid, you need to read what I; /html/fot/1996-12/msg00045.html (6,824 bytes)
10. Re: Brake fluid (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@spitfire.cs.utah.edu>; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 16:53:00 -0700; Chris K. sez: DOT 5 silicon fluid does not adsorb (adsorb should be the correct word - not absorb) much water, unlike DOT 3 or 4 (which has a max of ~5-6% adsorbtion, if I remeber correctly). Water i; /html/fot/1996-12/msg00046.html (7,796 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]