Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Brake\s+rotor\s+min\.\s+thickness\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Brake\s+rotor\s+min\.\s+thickness\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Brake rotor min. thickness (score: 1): Author: "Matthew Bouchelle" <CyberControls@ij.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 23:07:46 -0400; I've scoured all my sources this evening and can't seem to locate what the minimum thickness of a Tiger rotor should be. Want to have them turned and I'm sure the local shop won't know the min. Anyon; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00145.html (6,656 bytes)
2. Re: Brake rotor min. thickness (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 23:32:38 -0700; That is the one thing Rootes did not do. Stamp a minimum thickness on the rotor. Most manufacturer's do. and REQUIRE the rotors be turned with every pad change. Then they get to sock you for a new r; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00151.html (7,239 bytes)
3. FW: Brake rotor min. thickness (score: 1): Author: "Matthew Bouchelle" <CyberControls@ij.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 21:54:01 -0400; I had a few folks ask me to get back with them if I found anything on the rotors, therefore I'll post the answer. Below is a definitive response from Dan. My new favorite parts store, owned by two br; /html/tigers/2002-09/msg00293.html (7,405 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]