Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Brake\s+servo\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Brake servo (score: 1)
Author: CoolVT@aol.com
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 23:26:22 EDT
I rebuilt my brake servo 4-5 yrs. ago and it was great for a few years. Last year it swallowed up all the fluid (no visible leaks). What part should have been replaced and was not included in the reb
/html/tigers/1998-10/msg00103.html (6,419 bytes)

2. Re: Brake servo (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 07:33:43 -0700
I rebuilt my brake servo 4-5 yrs. ago and it was great for a few years. Last year it swallowed up all the fluid (no visible leaks). What part should have been replaced and was not included in the reb
/html/tigers/1998-10/msg00108.html (8,958 bytes)

3. Re: Brake Servo (score: 1)
Author: Bill Martin <bmartin@snf.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 07:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Call Norm, You can send it to him and he will rebuild it using Sunbeam specialties kit. Or you can buy a kit and do it at home. Bill
/html/tigers/1998-06/msg00003.html (6,904 bytes)

4. Re: Brake Servo (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 08:03:06 +0100
Having had experience with the Girling MkIA 5", 7", MkIB 7" and various Lockheed units, as well as seeing the Midland-Ross '55 T-Bird installation, I can offer these personnel observations. The MkII
/html/tigers/1998-06/msg00004.html (11,008 bytes)

5. Re: Brake Servo (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 09:05:18 +0100
Well, Bill's recommendation certainly fits my suggestion of a "qualified repair source". Sorry I left "Norm" off the list of names. Definitely belongs amongst the very best. Steve -- Steve Laifman <
/html/tigers/1998-06/msg00007.html (7,182 bytes)

6. Brake Servo (score: 1)
Author: john brawley <johnj7@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 19:59:55 -0700
I need to either have my MKI 5" servo rebuilt or just get the Lockheed replacment. Any comment on the pros and cons of each option? I heard the Lockheed unit is better than the original. Any recommen
/html/tigers/1998-05/msg00354.html (5,934 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu