Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*British\s+Motor\s+Heritage\.\.\.\s+to\s+FORD\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: MGMagnette@aol.com
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 15:10:46 EDT
In buying Range Rover, Ford Motor Company got the following: (Source: Road and TRack Daily Auto Insider) Ford will pay $2.7 billion to buy the Land Rover business, which includes its full line-up of
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01117.html (8,238 bytes)

2. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 20:25:02 +0100
No, the MG name *is* owned by Phoenix but the Rover name is only licenced to them by BMW for the current range of cars, this was an agreement between Ford and BMW to stop anyone else selling 4x4s und
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01120.html (9,815 bytes)

3. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 21:42:49 -0700
This is another example where the "name" has become worth as much or even more than the product. It's also happened to Lionel and Winchester. Something like breaking up a good car for parts as the pa
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01142.html (7,849 bytes)

4. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: "Charles D. Sorkin" <cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 08:02:44 -0400
buy It is my impression that Ford is extremely respectful of such items of histroical interest, and they have an extensive history in the LBC arena. Despite their current forray's with Jaguar, Aston
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01163.html (9,272 bytes)

5. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 08:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
I believe that this is a good thing, too, as GM seems to be more into wacky 'futuristic' styling versus the more retro looks that Ford, and especially DaimlerChrysler, are into. Anyone seen pictures
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01194.html (8,839 bytes)

6. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: Larry Macy <macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 12:54:42 -0400
Ya mean my Midget is now a Ford???? Larry Had a Found On Road Dead once - shot it. At this exact moment in time 5/25/00 3:10 PM, MGMagnette@aol.com made the profound statement: \ Larry B. Macy, Ph.D.
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01205.html (8,854 bytes)

7. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 17:01:09 +0100
Whilst I can understand that for commercial reasons they want to commonise parts across models I don't like their habit of making Jaguars at Halewood, on Mondeo floor pans etc. But what takes the bis
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01291.html (9,051 bytes)

8. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: "Charles D. Sorkin" <cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 12:16:05 -0400
I agree also. But in the case of Jaguar, look at it from Ford's point of view. When they bought the company, they inherited a factory with a dirt floor and 60-year old tooling. They really had no cho
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01292.html (10,045 bytes)

9. RE: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 12:56:34 -0600
OK Paul, what's a switchgear? A transmission? Oh yeah, here in the states it's "what takes the cake". :-) Do we speak the same language?? <grin> Larry Hoy
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01308.html (8,427 bytes)

10. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 12:41:16 -0700
Fortunately Ford doesn't get the MG brand in this deal, just the historical archives... Paul Hunt had this to say: -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it's the red one wi
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01312.html (9,471 bytes)

11. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 15:07:31 -0700
I hate to say this guys, but from everything I read here and on the MG Cars BBS, things are getting so mudled up that we will never see MG rise again to its prominence seen in the late 50's to early
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01314.html (8,331 bytes)

12. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@iname.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 17:50:51 -0600 (MDT)
phoenix didn't get the name, and BMW is sitting on it, then it is more dead than before. Andrew Lundgren Lundgren@iname.com http://www.itwest.net/~lundgren
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01323.html (8,596 bytes)

13. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: KGROWLER@aol.com
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 14:05:04 EDT
<<< Subject: Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD phoenix didn't get the name, and BMW is sitting on it, then it is more dead than before. >>> The MGF is continuing in production as are the Rover 25
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01348.html (9,378 bytes)

14. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 16:52:05 +0100
'switchgear' is the electrical switches like for headlights, wipers etc. Trust you lot to be greedy ;-)
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01450.html (8,671 bytes)

15. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 16:52:35 +0100
Patience, dear boy, patience ... commonise Halewood, Ford no pay words, have arena.
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01451.html (9,828 bytes)

16. Re: British Motor Heritage... to FORD (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 17:06:42 +0100
Heritage went to Ford - which was where this thread started. Phoenix got Austin and Morris as well as Wolseley and MG, plus the use of Rover for the time being.
/html/mgs/2000-05/msg01467.html (8,007 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu