Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*British\s+Submarine\s+\-\-\s+no\s+LBC\s+content\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*British\s+Submarine\s+\-\-\s+no\s+LBC\s+content\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. British Submarine -- no LBC content (score: 1): Author: "racespit@netzero.net" <racespit@netzero.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 10:58:43 -0400; Hi all! One of the British submarines firing at Afghanistan positions over the weekend was named Triumph. They hit the targets they aimed at -- they must not have had Lucas components in their firing; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00087.html (6,970 bytes)
2. Re: British Submarine -- no LBC content (score: 1): Author: "Gerald Van Vlack" <jerryvv@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:03:55 -0400; I hope the oil slick doesn't give away their position! ;-) weekend was named Triumph. components in their firing/actuating relays! ;) ;) ;); /html/fot/2001-10/msg00089.html (7,393 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]