Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Buick\s+V8\s+displacement\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Buick\s+V8\s+displacement\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Buick V8 displacement? (score: 1): Author: Tim Dziechowski <timd@hitu.enet.dec.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 94 14:51:12 EDT; Anyone know the displacement of the Buick V8 ancestor of the Rover V8? I have a chance to buy a jeep pickup with a "Buick 350 V8" engine swap for $250. I'll be looking at it this weekend. timd@hitu.e; /html/british-cars/1994-09/msg00667.html (6,731 bytes)
2. Re: Buick V8 displacement? (score: 1): Author: barry@darkness.Remedy.COM; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 94 13:49:58 -0700; The original Buick engine that became the Rover V8 displaces 215 cubic inches, which equates to 3.5 liters. If the Jeep really has a Buick 350 I bet it has an iron big-block in it, not the aluminum; /html/british-cars/1994-09/msg00671.html (6,826 bytes)
3. Re: Buick V8 displacement? (score: 1): Author: pwcs!phile@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu (Philip J Ethier); Date: Mon, 26 Sep 1994 15:13:07 +0000 (BST); Sure. 215 cubic inches. That's about 3500cc. Makes you wonder where Rover got the name for the 3500, huh?; /html/british-cars/1994-09/msg00672.html (6,698 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]