Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*C\&C\s+mods\s+in\s+stock\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*C\&C\s+mods\s+in\s+stock\.\.\.\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Steven N. Burkett" <sburkett@ooi.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 13:52:17 -0500 (CDT); Since this whole "comfort and convenience" thing has been recently taken to the extreme on this list, I thought I'd ask a related question. If I want to change something soley to reduce the likelihoo; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00880.html (8,459 bytes)
2. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 15:14:50 -0400; No. Reliability is performance. To finish first, you must first finish. This has been the interpretation for as long as I can remember. There are endless debates about whether that should be the inte; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00881.html (7,875 bytes)
3. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: Jeff Lloyd <jslz3@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 19:57:13 GMT; once again Carrying on this thread, can traction control be considered a C+C add-on? It will not increase the peformance and was an option, but only with a package that also included other Cold weath; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00884.html (7,776 bytes)
4. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 15:49:41 -0700; Steven, This is a long standing problem. It's called reliability vs. performance concerns. If you allow for a "reliability" modification, say your aluminum air separator tank, can you possibly forese; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00896.html (11,231 bytes)
5. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 18:04:48 -0400; FWIW, Porsche did issue a TSB on the chain tensioner. I believe this item is specifically is under review by the powers that be for approval. I think under the same precedent as MR2/Corolla/Camry/Toy; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00898.html (8,508 bytes)
6. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:39:47 -0700; No Kidding!? I didn't know that. When? -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro jhadler@rmi.net http://rainbow.rmi.net/~jhad; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00899.html (8,380 bytes)
7. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 08:00:00 -0400 (EDT); Seems strange to me that we can write rules that effectively prohibit turbo swaps on one model of car but we can't write rules that allow competitors in OUR GRASSROOTS SPORT FOR THE AVERAGE SCHMOE t; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00930.html (9,268 bytes)
8. RE: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fuhrmann" <bfuhrman@isd.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 09:44:10 -0500; Can we assume that you will quit your job and volunteer your time to do this for every car that exists for every item people want an exclusion on? -- OR -- Is this just another request for the famou; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00946.html (8,365 bytes)
9. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 11:34:38 -0400; I continue to be befuddled about why there's such an uproar about this stuff. Those people driving cars like this have a solution -- get together and get the manufacturer to issue a TSB authorizing t; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00949.html (8,984 bytes)
10. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:36:32 -0700; Mark, It's a great idea, and I certainly believe it has merit. However, the manufacturer may have other reasons behind not issuing a TSB. Issuing a TSB on their product might imply a weakness in thei; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00952.html (9,775 bytes)
11. RE: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:53:04 -0400 (EDT); Sure I'd be happy to. I'll even give you the list I'd propose for member comment for 2000. Neons can replace their front motor mount with any non-metal bushing mount that mounts to the factory locat; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00962.html (10,183 bytes)
12. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:04:19 -0400 (EDT); So in these situations, which typically won't show up on the street because you're not at high rpm a lot, aren't handling at the limit, and don't have sticky DOT racing tires, you contend that a man; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00964.html (10,370 bytes)
13. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Steven N. Burkett" <sburkett@ooi.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:13:05 -0500 (CDT); I think it depends on the car. Mazda issued a TSB for premature clutch wear, applicable to customers with a "habit" of hard acceleration. They changed the clutch facing to accomodate it. It'd be pret; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00967.html (9,207 bytes)
14. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:17:19 -0400; The fundamental argument I've heard for SFC's is that everyone puts these on (and NEEDS them), not just autocrossers. Why is there an ACR package, and a massive contingency package, if they won't las; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00968.html (9,794 bytes)
15. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:25:01 -0400 (EDT); Yeah, _that'll_ sure help the autocrosser. "Well, we're only paying you half the money we used to so that you can change that front motor mount." Not to mention that if they issue a TSB they get pot; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00969.html (9,905 bytes)
16. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:42:07 -0400; Because it's not just a Chrysler problem. This is a never-ending, evergrowing list with high maintenance costs. Your solution simply doesn't scale. You've already named six (Neon motor mounts, Porsch; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00971.html (9,746 bytes)
17. RE: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: Phil Vanner <pvanner@pclink.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 15:26:36 -0500; Add Spridgets ripping out their sway bar mounts. And I suppose if we allow people to reinforce parts of their car that have a tendency to break under race stresses, then Lotuses can pretty much re-en; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00987.html (8,761 bytes)
18. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 17:52:03 -0400; While having a side discussion about this I found a TSB doe not ensure Apparently, Porsche DOES have a cam chain tensioner TSB. It was submitted to the powers that be. It was turned down. Somehow, th; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01002.html (10,310 bytes)
19. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 18:41:11 -0400 (EDT); Its interesting that in three examples you're already at one that's clearly not an exclusionary type weakness. Look, I never said the list wouldn't grow, but to say is doesn't scale is kinda silly.; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01010.html (11,296 bytes)
20. Re: C&C mods in stock... (score: 1): Author: Ghsharp@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 19:15:31 EDT; If I remember correctly, the TSB from Porsche gave the_option_of using the oil-fed tensioner *or* the older-style hydraulic one. According to past practice, a TSB or mfr recall notice that *mandates*; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01018.html (9,550 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]