Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*C4\-C5\s+Corvettes\s+in\s+stock\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*C4\-C5\s+Corvettes\s+in\s+stock\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: Ben Thatcher <bthatch@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:38:54 -0400; The C4 Corvettes have consistently proven to be faster in autocross than C5s. Speculation that the new Z06 will dominate is yet to be proved. What looks good on paper, from factory hype and enthusias; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00454.html (7,838 bytes)
2. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Ron Bauer" <ronbauer@aa.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:18:38 -0700; I'm not so sure about this comment. I've driven both cars, and at least in SS trim, the new 2000 model C5 hardtop seems to me to be a VERY good car to have for the class! Ron Bauer Y2K S2K; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00458.html (8,589 bytes)
3. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: Ben Thatcher <bthatch@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 12:56:18 -0400; Ron, is this from how the car feels or from some objective testing? The reason I ask is that the C5 Corvette is very impressive from a feeling perspective. It is designed to be the "Lexus" of sports; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00462.html (9,574 bytes)
4. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:22:35 -0700; I expect the Mollekers to do very well in their C5 at Nationals. Their PAXed times are very competitive with the best drivers in the NW Region including the top SS RX7TT driver, Mike Lillejord. Heck,; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00464.html (8,318 bytes)
5. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:57:07 -0700; Ran a C5 coupe this weekend on two consecutive runs after three consecutive runs in my RX-7. Long course. 65.0 in the RX-7 and 65.8 in the C5 - and I have driven C5's exactly that many times ever, tw; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00465.html (10,489 bytes)
6. RE: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 12:25:36 -0500; I expect the Mollekers to do very well in their C5 at Nationals. Their PAXed times are very competitive with the best drivers in the NW Region including the top SS RX7TT driver, Mike Lillejord. Heck,; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00467.html (8,971 bytes)
7. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:28:26 -0400; I think the reason C4s have been faster than C5s is is mainly due to the lack of development time on the C5s. Remember, a non-Z51, automatic C5 with stock shocks trophied at Nationals last year and w; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00468.html (9,248 bytes)
8. RE: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:27:33 -0700; Or maybe the Z06 is the ZR1 all over again, so it goes strait to BSP like the ZR1 did when it was new. Jason "RX7 KLR" Isley jason.isley@alltel.com I think the reason C4s have been faster than C5s is; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00473.html (9,612 bytes)
9. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:38:10 PDT; I don't know about that. As fast, maybe. Most of the better drivers are still in C4s and RX-7s, because those are the cars they already have. But by all means send your letter in to have the two cla; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00487.html (10,067 bytes)
10. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Ron Bauer" <ronbauer@aa.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:50:10 -0700; Although I have to admit that it was somewhat by "feel," as a McKamey instructor, I have driven most cars that are out there and think that I have a pretty good grasp by feel on how good a car is. Th; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00488.html (12,736 bytes)
11. RE: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Michael Bullis" <Mike@benchmarksales.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:08:26 -0700; <<IMO, a good argument could be made to put the regular C5s in with the C4s (including the ZR1!)>> ok Kent, you must be hiding one of these big fat a$$ed vetts in the garage next to the GS... bring i; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00491.html (8,692 bytes)
12. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:18:30 -0700; Myself, I take the above with a grain of salt. Miatas are, at best, difficult to drive in the wet. At worst, they are scary; I almost spun mine on an on-ramp during a light rain. Not to impugn Mr. Mo; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00523.html (9,189 bytes)
13. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Ron Bauer" <ronbauer@aa.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:10:24 -0700; I would dispute the Miata being an inherently bad rain car.... Joe Goeke and I were still normally at the top of Pax when we ran the car a couple of years ago. Ron Bauer mine was bad; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00531.html (9,589 bytes)
14. RE: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:58:46 -0700; Miata's are great in the rain, provided you are on anything but Jason "RX7 KLR" Isley jason.isley@alltel.com I would dispute the Miata being an inherently bad rain car.... Joe Goeke and I were still; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00533.html (10,062 bytes)
15. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Mon Jul 10 20:30:25 2000; We are getting away from the point, which should be Best of Breed. If the C4 (which has consitently beaten the C5's) is a Vette, then it should stay in SS. Look at the reclassed AS vette's... no one; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00536.html (10,542 bytes)
16. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Mike Bullis" <mike@benchmarksales.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 20:13:41 -0700; << And a C4 you would have to shift to 2nd.>> not in the later c-4's: the lt4 (6600 rpm fuel cut-off i think) cars can do 53 mph in 1st - the Lt5 cars 58-60 (7072 rpm cut-off & depending on tire) - d; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00544.html (7,876 bytes)
17. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 19:30:28 -0700; My Miata rain experience so far has been only one event, which I ran on my street tires (Dunlop SP8000's, if you're interested; at the time they had ~500 miles on them including about two hours at Se; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00549.html (11,330 bytes)
18. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: Stephen Bernard <solo-2@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:50:01 -0400; On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:58:46 -0700 "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com> Hooters are better in the car than on it anyway. :^) Sorry couldn't resist.; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00582.html (8,014 bytes)
19. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "John Gross" <jogross3@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:26:17 PDT; It's true these cars can go fast in 1st, but also keep in mind that the LT4's and the ZR1's can't turn compared to the L98 cars (at least in stock form) This is why the BSP combo to have is an early; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00607.html (9,149 bytes)
20. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <conekiller@prodigy.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:44:57 -0400; They said the same thing about the new Celica's in ES, and Cashmore took an old one with some 25hp less, more weight and less tourqe and beat up on the 2 best Y2K Celica's in the country in Peru, on; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00681.html (10,416 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]