- 1. CA smog, or Why I'll stay away from CA (score: 1)
- Author: JAMES <JBMYERS@msuvx2.memphis.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 14:17:24 -0500 (CDT)
- [RANT detectors ON] All this recent discussion regarding getting cars "tested" and "certified" by the AirPolice in California only confirms my decision that I'll not move to CA in this lifetime. Havi
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00552.html (7,601 bytes)
- 2. Re: CA smog, or Why I'll stay away from CA (score: 1)
- Author: DamitDick@megaweb.com (Damit Dick)
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 13:34:19
- James "they aren't inspectors, they're REVENOO-ERS" B... Hear! Hear! If the real estate market hadn't gone all to pot out here; and I could get the $$$ I've sunk into this place back out; you can ju
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00558.html (8,056 bytes)
- 3. Re: CA smog, or Why I'll stay away from CA (score: 1)
- Author: fickes@taurus.apple.com (Stan Fickes)
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 14:15:06 -0700
- The big advantage of owning "old clunkers" in California is that 1965 and earlier cars are exempt from pollution control inspections. I will not purchase a car produced after 1965... I figure I'm sa
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00559.html (7,776 bytes)
- 4. Re: CA smog, or Why I'll stay away from CA (score: 1)
- Author: dcraig@u2systems.com (Dean Craig)
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 11:39:16 -0700
- After rescuing my '64 B from 9 years of storage in the California desert, I went down to the DMV to register it. The clerk asked for my smog certificate, and I had the sublime pleasure of responding
- /html/mgs/1995-08/msg00745.html (8,350 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu