Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*California\s+Registration\s+Tags\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*California\s+Registration\s+Tags\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: Larry Allbritton <larryall@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 18:09:09 -0700; I bought my registration tags today for the Mk1. Cost me $128 which I thought was quite high for a 32 year old car. The lady at DMV told me it is because the car is a classic. I tried to tell her tha; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00363.html (8,110 bytes)
2. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: BMcgu22954@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 21:33:10 -0400 (EDT); << I bought my registration tags today for the Mk1. Cost me $128 which I thought was quite high for a 32 year old car. The lady at DMV told me it is because the car is a classic. I tried to tell her; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00365.html (8,524 bytes)
3. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: "Bill and Carol Rogers" <milward@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 19:52:50 -0700; 1965 Mk 1, No chg of ownership for years, DMV fees $46 - but my '64 Cooper S is $146; it has gone down since I bought it 5 years ago and the value (cost?) was the driver. Yours must have changed hand; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00366.html (9,393 bytes)
4. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: ritchie@mcn.org (Armand & Lorie Ritchie); Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:11:57 -0700; Larry you got off lite, they dinged us $243.00. At the DMV they told us it was based on the value of the car. I don't know when or how they arrived at this amount. It was already set when we bought; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00368.html (9,040 bytes)
5. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: Larry Allbritton <larryall@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:17:24 -0700; I am going to write a letter to DMV Sacramento. This was the suggestion of the lady at the local DMV office. I am confused as to why they are considering the car a classic and even if they are then w; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00369.html (9,727 bytes)
6. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: Spook37211@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 23:31:53 -0400 (EDT); << I bought my registration tags today for the Mk1. Cost me $128 which I thought was quite high for a 32 year old car. The lady at DMV told me it is because the car is a classic. I tried to tell her; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00370.html (8,549 bytes)
7. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 22:08:45 +0100; The Tag price is cheap, and independent of the car. The money your complaining about is the personal property tax. This is based solely on the sales price of the car. In the late 50's the auto deale; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00371.html (8,797 bytes)
8. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: Frank Marrone <marrone@wco.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 22:25:11 -0700; Larry, The registration fee is related to the value of the car at the time you register it. Make a case for a lower value if you want to reduce the fees. When I registered the Tiger they wanted to k; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00372.html (9,279 bytes)
9. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: Harold Hartsell <hartsell@thegrid.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 08:09:08 -0700; I just re-registered my Mk1 and it was $60. Harold B9470535; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00374.html (7,775 bytes)
10. Re[2]: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 97 08:47:44 PST; Due to the "chicanery" of the 2 previous owners of our TIGER; sold twice back-and-forth, no transfer fees paid, late fees & penalties,etc., the first-time registration for our '66 TIGER was $320.00 I; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00375.html (8,359 bytes)
11. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: Allan Connell <alcon@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 13:01:47 -0700; Larry and all As you know, tags costs/fees are dependent on "value" of the vehicle. My 1965 MK1 is titled as a "SUNBEA", and when I registed it my bill of sale said $2,500. As I recall, my total tag; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00385.html (8,925 bytes)
12. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: brockctella@juno.com (Brock C Tella); Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 19:26:38 -0700; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00390.html (8,591 bytes)
13. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: DSand95510@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 09:47:59 -0400 (EDT); tags?............. has jumped into a minefield and is attempting to charge an annual FMV-determined personal property tax on older and 'classic' cars as part of registration fees, but the rules for s; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00419.html (8,827 bytes)
14. Re: California Registration Tags (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 09:35:55 +0100; Dick Sanders requested information on the California registration fees. Although I posted the process in the beginning of this thread, I will repeat it for those who may have missed it. 1) The "Regis; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00422.html (11,949 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]