Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cam\s+Recommendation\s+for\s+MGB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cam\s+Recommendation\s+for\s+MGB\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Cam Recommendation for MGB (score: 1): Author: John Di Fede <difejo@optonline.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:28:21 -0700; Hello all; I am usually lurking in the background, but I need some advice from the members of the list. I am currently rebuilding my 1973 MGB engine and would like some advice regarding upgraded cam; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00433.html (8,575 bytes)
2. Re: Cam Recommendation for MGB (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:16:40 EDT; I will be installing this cam into a MGB engine with a +.020 overbore and a ported cylinder head with 1.625 inlet valves, peco exhaust, K&N filters and HIF carbs (but I have a Weber 45 DCOE and canno; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00440.html (8,512 bytes)
3. Re: Cam Recommendation for MGB (score: 1): Author: "Paul M." <rowman22001@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:27:31 -0700 (PDT); On a similar note, I'm getting ready to rebuild my 1971 MGB engine, and I need some cam help as well. The only difference is that I'm looking for people who have installed more aggressive camshafts i; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00441.html (9,050 bytes)
4. Re: Cam Recommendation for MGB (score: 1): Author: "Alexander Moentjens" <moene@pi.be>; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:52:45 +0200; I'm using a Piper BP 285. My engine's a 1950cc with 10.8:1 CR (runs fine on regular fuel over here in Europe, don't know how the fuel they sell over here 's the same quality as the one in the states; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00446.html (8,337 bytes)
5. Re: Cam Recommendation for MGB (score: 1): Author: "Norm" <twobees@sprynet.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:57:57 -0400; I don't know if I can find either specs or i.d. info on the cam Dave Headley (Fab-Tek) installed in my MGB. But, if it isn't already packed away for moving, I'll take a look later today. I run about; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00465.html (8,166 bytes)
6. Fw: Cam Recommendation for MGB (score: 1): Author: John Di Fede <difejo@optonline.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:41:24 -0700; Regarding the engine's compression..... I've just measured the combustion chamber cc'c and estimate that the compression ratio on this engine will be AT LEAST 9:1. I've also found the Piper website i; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00472.html (8,939 bytes)
7. Re: Cam Recommendation for MGB (score: 1): Author: David Ambrose <stargazer1@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 18:33:16 -0700; I have this cam in my MGB with exactly the same overbore. I'm running stock cylinder head (with hardened valve seats), SU's, and stock exaust system. Overall, it's been a very satisfactory mod. Freew; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00481.html (8,373 bytes)
8. Re: Cam Recommendation for MGB (score: 1): Author: Carl Elliott <celliott133@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 17:37:06 -0400; I have the street cam, Pistons are .040 over. It seems slower at low reve but when you hit 2500 and up its nice. Fast might be to fast for regular use. Carl E.; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00509.html (7,456 bytes)
9. Re: Cam Recommendation for MGB (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:36:27 EDT; Regarding compression ratio, you have to measure the volume of the swept cylinder and the combustion chamber when the engine is apart. I also have the slighlty dished h/c pistons which have a dish vo; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00556.html (8,148 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]