Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cam\s+choice\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cam\s+choice\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Cam choice (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 02:58:39 EST; Any real world comments on which Kent cam gives good low end torque? Bob C in; /html/spridgets/2004-02/msg00997.html (6,241 bytes)
2. Re: Cam choice (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:45:29 -0500; Bob and list, I'd be interested in the replies you get on this..... I'm leaning towards the Kent MD266 (engine - 1275cc - 30 over with Weber 45dcoe and LCB header) My compression is at about 9:1....; /html/spridgets/2004-02/msg01005.html (6,981 bytes)
3. Re: Cam choice (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:26:04 -0800; I've got the Kent 266 in my car and it's real nice. It idles like a stock motor but will pull to red line with no problems. I like to just putt around sometimes too and it never protestes. I've also; /html/spridgets/2004-02/msg01007.html (7,429 bytes)
4. Re: Cam choice (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:01:31 -0800; What lift ratio are you considering? Original (1.3) or 1.5? Mike MacLean 60 Sprite; /html/spridgets/2004-02/msg01072.html (7,786 bytes)
5. Re: Cam choice (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:08:04 -0800; My engine uses an Elgin 003 (268) cam. Engine is for street use - 1380cc - single HIF6 SU (1.75 inch) - Long 3-1 header - compression at 9.4:1. I only have about 180 miles on engine so have not seen; /html/spridgets/2004-02/msg01108.html (8,403 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]