Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cam\s+lube\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cam\s+lube\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Cam lube (score: 1): Author: "Steven P. Clifton" <sclifton@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:50:07 -0500; Looking to find out which product to use on my new camshaft for cam lobe and lifter break in. Best Regards, Steve Clifton 72 MGB; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00177.html (6,514 bytes)
2. RE: Cam lube (score: 1): Author: "Gordie's Garage" <mg_garage@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 05:12:55 -0500; Funny you should ask that Steve. I just had my machinist hone my cam bearings on my 1622. He says that the assembly lube (avail at local parts store or Moss) is too heavy and to mix it 50/50 with 30; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00178.html (7,005 bytes)
3. Re: Cam lube (score: 1): Author: "Ed Woods" <fogbro1@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:26:59 -0500; I disagree with your machinest. You ought to get a second opinion before proceeding with this method. Isky cam lube is what I've used for many years. My machine ship agrees with the choice. Ed Woods; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00181.html (6,693 bytes)
4. RE: Cam lube (score: 1): Author: "Gordie's Garage" <mg_garage@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:37:01 -0500; I have no doubt that Isky knows of what they speak when it comes to cams, probably today's cams and technology. I believe that if you are working on 50 yr old technology, using 30yr old methods woul; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00182.html (7,093 bytes)
5. Re: Cam lube (score: 1): Author: "JustBrits_com" <justbrits@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:17:05 -0600; YOU know I am not new to this area nor a "spring chicken"<G>! Your "machinest" is NUTS. I called mine who does stuff for practally every major gov. motor pool and builds up to (their admitted to<G>); /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00183.html (6,793 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]