Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Camber\s+Limits\s+\-\s+none\s+required\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Camber Limits - none required (score: 1)
Author: rohns@doitnow.com (Jim & Marilyn Rohn)
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 10:12:36 -0700
ooooh, ooooh, ooooohh (<poor Horschak imitation) how about a "claiming" rule for shocks instead? :-) $1000 says you can buy any set of 4 from any car in the class you are running in .... discuss agre
/html/autox/2000-07/msg00399.html (8,663 bytes)

2. Re: Camber Limits - none required (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 12:37:59 -0700
$1000 is still a lot of money to many of us - how about the "new value of factory stock shocks"? Yep, I'm suggesting factory shocks or Pep Boys/Sears/Checker/Etc. shocks, claimable for the face cost
/html/autox/2000-07/msg00403.html (9,093 bytes)

3. Re: Camber Limits - none required (score: 1)
Author: Erik Van-der-Mey <autox@webcentrix.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:34:23 -0500
Sounds like those who are whining about not being able to get any negative camber should be whining to the respective manufacturers of their cars. Here's a sample letter: Dear (Honda/Mitsubishi/Toyo
/html/autox/2000-07/msg00448.html (8,544 bytes)

4. Re: Camber Limits - none required (score: 1)
Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 19:37:45 -0500
Of course, I would then have to take off my *stock* adjustables on my ACR, right? :-/ Pat
/html/autox/2000-07/msg00539.html (7,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu