Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Canada\-US\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Canada\-US\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Canada-US (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 17:17:44 EST; <<Besides, there is no history of animosity between Canada and the US Unliike France and Britain (rivals to the death for most of recorded history) >> Well, we did burn your capitol, so we are still; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01103.html (7,098 bytes)
2. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: Larry Dickstein <bugide@tfs.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 16:42:51 -0800; Well, Bill, I explained all of that to a girl in a bar in Rigaud (Re-go??) many, many years ago. As I remember it was on route 40, west of Montreal, along a river. Beautiful area. Since I spoke no Fr; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01107.html (8,028 bytes)
3. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: "John J. Peloquin" <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 15:25:16 -0800 (PST); Dear Bill, When our capitol was burned, it was burned by the British, Canada was not an independent state at the time and the blame is therefore correctly laid at the feet of the English, as is prope; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01114.html (7,842 bytes)
4. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: Nory@webtv.net (Nory); Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 23:28:54 -0500; Yeah, but our ladies hockey team beat your ladies hockey team, eh? -NORY Don't assume that because you have found one problem, you have found the ONLY problem. '74 Midget & '71 parts car '94 Ford Ran; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01148.html (7,851 bytes)
5. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (John McEwen); Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 21:52:20 -0500; And it's too bad the guys didn't stick around for another dose. John; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01150.html (8,100 bytes)
6. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 18:08:19 -0500; When bodychecking is a penalty, it's not hockey. -- Trevor Boicey Ottawa, Canada tboicey@brit.ca http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01177.html (7,764 bytes)
7. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: Nory@webtv.net (Nory); Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 01:00:56 -0500; On the contrary, Trevor, the skating and finesse with the puck are the required "skills" of the game. There's more to hockey than just bashing the other guy against the boards -NORY Don't assume that; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01190.html (7,995 bytes)
8. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 01:04:49 -0500; What are you, european? ;> Hockey is a physical game. The highest level of hockey is the NHL and the Olympics/World Cup, all of which play the physical game. Do you consider touch football a "pure" v; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01191.html (8,407 bytes)
9. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: "Thomas M. Evers" <fam.evers@netcologne.de>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 12:25:54 +0100; Yeah....... Final without canada / usa Sorry........ Thomas M.; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01194.html (7,785 bytes)
10. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: "Glen Eldridge" <glenel@total.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 06:47:47 -0500; Hey, Fellas - Red Fisher once said, "I went to the fights and a hockey game broke out!" Modern NHL hockey has become a combination of high finance and professional wrestling with a cow-chip tossing c; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01195.html (9,606 bytes)
11. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: Nory@webtv.net (Nory); Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 09:16:44 -0500; Couldn't have said it better myself. I would add to those players, Guy Lefluer and Gilbert Perreault - Great skaters, puck handlers, and shooters, and I don't think I ever saw them fight either. -NO; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01198.html (8,006 bytes)
12. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: "John J. Peloquin" <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 08:00:53 -0800 (PST); Dear Trevor, =%O =%O What are you, european? ;> =%O =%O Hockey is a physical game. The highest level of hockey is the NHL =%Oand the Olympics/World Cup, all of which play the physical game. =%O =%O D; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01202.html (10,178 bytes)
13. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 17:53:46 -0500; I think you need to learn a bit more about the game before making comments. NOBODY is talking about fighting. The original comment was about BODY CHECKING. In the women's game, BODY CHECKING IS A PEN; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01210.html (8,325 bytes)
14. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: "John J. Peloquin" <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 07:31:23 -0800 (PST); Dear Trevor, =%O =%O I think you need to learn a bit more about the game before =%Omaking comments. =%O =%O NOBODY is talking about fighting. =%O =%O The original comment was about BODY CHECKING. =%O; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01294.html (9,649 bytes)
15. Re: Canada-US (score: 1): Author: "Quirt, Dave" <quirt@src.sk.ca>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 15:43:00 -0600; As a 'maudit Anglais' from the Ottawa-Hull area who now lives on the Prairies, I now often think of the Quebecois as 'maudit'. For those lucky enough not to know anything about Canada-Quebec relatio; /html/mgs/1998-02/msg01310.html (7,468 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]