Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Car\s+\&\s+Driver\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Car\s+\&\s+Driver\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: HOOGLY@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 19:46:19 EDT; The June 99 issue includes a several page article on the new Morgan. I haven't seen it yet but you may want to look out for it. John Rogers 65+4; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00054.html (7,126 bytes)
2. Re: CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: "J.D. Welch" <jdwelch@datawing.com>; Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 18:11:46 -0600; I just read it yesterday. It's a pretty good article, except for the end of one section where, talking about the recently USA-approved models, Peter Morgan said (and I paraphrase), "We don't need the; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00056.html (7,791 bytes)
3. Re: CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: "Bob Perry" <rperry@stny.lrun.com>; Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 20:43:01 -0400; When you remember that the US cut him off and some rather large percentage (I don't remember how much) of his sales went away overnight, it's not surprising that he feels that way. 61 +4 4-seater Smo; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00058.html (8,688 bytes)
4. Re: CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: LSelz@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 21:44:59 EDT; << It's a pretty good article, except for the end of one section where, talking about the recently USA-approved models, Peter Morgan said (and I paraphrase), "We don't need the US. It could go away t; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00060.html (8,632 bytes)
5. Re: CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: scott.barrie@CIMtegration.com (Scott Barrie); Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 21:56:39 -0500; There are about six gazillion ways to shape someone's words to make them say whatever you want them to say, so I wouldn't jump to any conclusions..... That aside, given that production comes nowhere; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00061.html (8,741 bytes)
6. Re: CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: Bill McCarthy <guinness@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 06:05:59 -0400; Likewise, the June '99 issue of Road & Track contains a road test of a new 1999 Plus 8. It is R&T's first road test of a Morgan since 1980. FYI-price as tested is $64,779. Bill McCarthy 94 +4; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00068.html (7,967 bytes)
7. Re: CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: "Stuart J. Ross" <stuross@nac.net>; Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 07:52:53 -0400; I haven't read the Car & Driver article yet. Regarding Peter Morgan's comments, I would say that it isn't the US buyers that have hurt the Morgan market. It is all the EPA regs as starters. Talk to a; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00069.html (10,116 bytes)
8. Re: CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: TrmpetDave@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 02:54:38 EDT; << "We don't need the US. It could go away tomorrow and we wouldn't notice it.">> I am a little surprised that Peter Morgan would say that, even though it is true, given the 5 year wait for Morgans i; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00102.html (8,437 bytes)
9. Car & Driver (score: 1): Author: Lorne Goldman <snotrek@cil.qc.ca>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 18:21:06 -0400; I decided to see what the fuss was about and buy the June edition of Car & Driver. It is a wholly different kettle of fish from the Road & Track review. Aside from the new forthcoming power plant cha; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00150.html (10,469 bytes)
10. Re: Car & Driver (score: 1): Author: LSelz@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 20:49:27 EDT; << Regardless of the quality of the new car (there is not enough hard fact to comment of that intelligently), this article makes everyone involved look poorly. It cannot be considered a PR coupe for; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00153.html (9,360 bytes)
11. Re: Car & Driver (score: 1): Author: toad <toad@storm.ca>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 21:51:08 -0400; Look inwardly to answer a rhetoric question such as the one you have just posed. Toad '59 Plus 4 '57 Plus 4 and the Old Fellow Angus the '33 Super Sport.; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00156.html (9,843 bytes)
12. Re: Car & Driver (score: 1): Author: LSelz@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 22:01:17 EDT; (copying Lannis' rhetorical question) << Am I missing something here? WHY ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH WOULD I CHANGE MY PRODUCT AROUND AND TAKE A RISK LIKE THAT UNDER THOSE CONDITIONS???? So there can be a; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00157.html (9,453 bytes)
13. Re: Car & Driver (score: 1): Author: "William G. Lamb, III" <lambroving@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 23:10:06 -0400; The short answer: It is just possible to obtain regulatory waivers for a company building less than 500 cars in the U.K. MMC hope to be building ~ 700 cars in a year or two. Around 200 cars were sold; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00158.html (9,702 bytes)
14. Re: Car & Driver (score: 1): Author: LSelz@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 23:29:27 EDT; << The new car will be built to meet all of these as the current car hasn't a prayer. >> So what you're saying is that the technology IS becoming obsolete, because worldwide "safety" regulations are; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00159.html (8,798 bytes)
15. Re: Car & Driver (score: 1): Author: ARoman4047@aol.com; Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 07:39:16 EDT; If the Car & Driver article is accurate, then it is indeed unfortunate that this "new" Morgan is the future of Malvern...This best/worst of high tech combined with nostalgic touches (an ash dash boa; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00166.html (9,750 bytes)
16. Re: Car & Driver (score: 1): Author: Bob Nogueira <nogera@prodigy.net>; Date: Tue, 11 May 99 17:19:51 -0500; -- [ From: Bob Nogueira * EMC.Ver #3.1a ] -- -- REPLY, Original message follows -- The EEC have SERIOUS regulations for front, ends, these as Sounds like he needs Bill Fink rather than Lawrence. I re; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00171.html (9,074 bytes)
17. Re: Car & Driver (score: 1): Author: "Michael D. Miles, PE" <mdmiles@home.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 17:20:32 -0700; If I might offer my tuppence... Regarding the description of the new vehicle and the changes that might be wrought: Anyone seeking a retro-styled, pseudo-classic can go find a Zimmer, Panther, or Exc; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00173.html (11,753 bytes)
18. Re: CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: "William G. Lamb, III" <lambroving@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 14:57:03 -0400; I've been waiting to comment until I could get my hands on both articles. This I managed yesterday. After reading them, I then felt that I needed to speak to Charles Morgan about what I might be abl; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00195.html (19,578 bytes)
19. Re: CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: LSelz@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 17:01:50 EDT; William - Thanks for the MMC/Car & Driver update. That kind of firsthand information is worth more than every magazine article ever written, since you're not trying to sell magazines, and not trying; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00198.html (8,429 bytes)
20. Re: CAR & DRIVER (score: 1): Author: CHarris990@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 00:43:41 EDT; << Sadly, the MIRA air-bag crash tests had been conducted using cars with Fink/ Isis bumper mounting structures,and for reasons of liability it was mandated by MMC that both U.S. Agents use this arra; /html/morgans/1999-05/msg00204.html (11,913 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]