Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Carbs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Carbs\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Carbs (score: 1): Author: "Larry list account" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:36:08 -0600; Let's suppose someone did some boring and stroking on a Rover 4.6 and ended up with about a 5.0L engine. Mild street cam, modest compression ratio. Do any of you have an idea as to what carburetor cf; /html/mgb-v8/2004-07/msg00015.html (8,454 bytes)
2. RE: Carbs (score: 1): Author: "Larry list account" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:27:31 -0600; The 500cfm number seems to be the winner. I've received several messages on and off the list that recommend the 500cfm carb. Thanks to all that responded. Larry Hoy /// /// mgb-v8@autox.team.net mail; /html/mgb-v8/2004-07/msg00023.html (8,381 bytes)
3. Re: Carbs (score: 1): Author: "Carl Floyd" <cmfloyd@chartertn.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:06:27 -0400; Ooops, my message didn't go thru. Guess I didn't edit my reply. I'd still go Hey John, I have a '68 Camaro with a 350 pushing 400HP. It runs in the 12s at the dragstrip with loads of wheelspin on str; /html/mgb-v8/2004-07/msg00026.html (8,924 bytes)
4. Re: Carbs (score: 1): Author: "T. S. White" <tswrace@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 01:14:57 -0700; Hi Larry, I ma late getting back but want to voice my opinion. For a 5.0 that is built a little 500 cfm is too lean. I have a 5.0 on which I am running the Holley 570 Street Avenger and that may be t; /html/mgb-v8/2004-07/msg00027.html (7,871 bytes)
5. RE: Carbs (score: 1): Author: "Simon Austin" <simon_mgb@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:08:20 -0700; Don't know if you still need any info on carbs but the formula to determine CFM requirements is: (CID/2) x (RPM/1728) = CFM The RPM is the peak RPM the engine will "see". I'm planning on using the E; /html/mgb-v8/2004-07/msg00029.html (7,876 bytes)
6. Carbs (score: 1): Author: <rshellen@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 23:26:18 -0500; I have been watching the discussion on different carbs for V-8 conversions. I have a 215 with the original 4 barrel Rochester . Its not in any car yet, however I was wondering why nobody mentions usi; /html/mgb-v8/2003-12/msg00030.html (7,055 bytes)
7. RE: Carbs (score: 1): Author: "Larry list account" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 06:56:13 -0700; Ron, I think the reason for not using the 4 barrel Rochester is height. I don't think anyone has used them without 'bumping' the hood a bit. Larry Hoy Carter 400 /// /// mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing; /html/mgb-v8/2003-12/msg00031.html (7,931 bytes)
8. Re: Carbs (score: 1): Author: "James Nazarian" <jhn3@uakron.edu>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:46:04 -0500; I don't know how the 4bbl compares to the 2bbl but with an MGC bonnet I am able to fit the 2bbl with its stock airbox. The system is about 1/8" from contacting the C bonnet so I wouldn't recommend ru; /html/mgb-v8/2003-12/msg00045.html (9,097 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]