Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cat\s+\&\s+car\s+video\s+NOT\s+FOR\s+CAT\s+LOVERS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cat\s+\&\s+car\s+video\s+NOT\s+FOR\s+CAT\s+LOVERS\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 16:59:27 -0400; Ford Sportka & Cat video Ford is getting some grief about this ad, presumably by cat lovers 1) Not for children 2) NOT for cat lovers 3) It's about 1 meg, so if are on dialup, keep that in mind 4) Cr; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00315.html (7,859 bytes)
2. Re: Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 16:58:01 -0700 (PDT); VERY funny, Tab - it's amazing what they can get away with in Europe....... Dan The Garden State '76 MGB Tourer - Driver - It's getting better all the time.... '65 MGB Tourer Project - Yep, still is.; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00338.html (8,085 bytes)
3. RE: Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: "Dean T. Lake" <dtlake@erols.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 20:21:43 -0400; I had heard of this video and mistakenly thought I'd seen it already. In actuality what I had seen was the similar video that used a pigeon as its victim. This was a hoot - a very disturbing hoot -; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00340.html (8,658 bytes)
4. RE: Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:16:20 -0400; I had read the snopes article before posting, actually. That doesn't mean Ford hasn't been getting grief for it. The ad agency had put together the cat one, Ford didn't go for it and opted for the pi; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00341.html (9,224 bytes)
5. Re: Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:24:47 +0100; I haven't seen either on TV in my part of the UK (we are getting the convertible ad at the moment) and there is no way that *either* would be shown on UK TV, at least. It could well have been done wi; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00346.html (8,697 bytes)
6. Re: Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <ptroot@iaces.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 06:43:59 -0500; I believe the Volvo ad showed up on US TV. I seem to remember seeing that.; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00350.html (8,927 bytes)
7. RE: Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: "David Breneman" <DAVID.BRENEMAN@dhl.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:07:14 -0700; Yeah, but then you have to clean all the cat heads out of your car! :-); /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00358.html (7,808 bytes)
8. RE: Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 19:59:00 -0400; True, but only that one time.; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00359.html (7,935 bytes)
9. Re: Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:43:57 +0100; ... per cat ...; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00365.html (7,700 bytes)
10. RE: Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:02:49 EDT; Yeah, but then you have to clean all the cat heads out of your car! :-) And if you had velour seat covers that would certainly be a cat-astrophe...... Bill; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00380.html (7,697 bytes)
11. RE: Cat & car video NOT FOR CAT LOVERS (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:30:40 -0400; Maybe the whole thing could be avoided. Is a 'Lytic' better than a cat? Because I'm wondering if this could be a job for the catalytic converter.; /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00384.html (7,712 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]