- 1. Cat or not? (score: 1)
- Author: "NORWOOD" <NORWOOD@email.msn.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 08:43:17 +0100
- I am hoping to trade my 4/4 4 (1987) for a +8 (1991-1993) in the next few weeks. I have decided what specification to look for apart from whether I should have one with a cat or not? Ignoring any env
- /html/morgans/1998-06/msg00090.html (6,835 bytes)
- 2. RE: Cat or not? (score: 1)
- Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 08:47:40 -0400
- converter," not "feline." I don't see how we, in this day and age, can "ignor[e] any environmental benefits." Go with the converter; it will make you sleep better at night knowing that you've done y
- /html/morgans/1998-06/msg00091.html (7,978 bytes)
- 3. Re: Cat or not? (score: 1)
- Author: Gary Kneisley <kneisley@ohio.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 11:22:26 -0400
- George... Here in the US, some state governments have mandated "e-check" inspections wherein cars cannot get a license if they don't pass. There are a few exeptions which are hard to get. It makes se
- /html/morgans/1998-06/msg00092.html (8,650 bytes)
- 4. Re: Cat or not? (score: 1)
- Author: "William G. Lamb, III" <lambroving@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 18:58:24 -0400
- Your suggestion about the article in "Classic & Sports Car" does indeed provide all the definitive answers, pro and con. I heartily endorse it for George. As to your own vehicle, if it is pinging un
- /html/morgans/1998-06/msg00093.html (10,478 bytes)
- 5. Re: Cat or not? (score: 1)
- Author: Jeremy Edwards <jeremy@jmemee.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 18:54:38 +0100
- In performance terms there is no appreciable difference- indeed, it has been suggested that the CAT car is more consistant, but: CATs are sensitive creatures and have a limited life don't like impact
- /html/morgans/1998-06/msg00100.html (8,115 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu