- 1. Central Valley Classics Responds! (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 11:13:08 -0700
- Tigers, and Mr. "Owner" of Central Valley Classics, anonymous, Below is the message received from Central Valley Classics, without the identification of the person sending the message. This is in res
- /html/tigers/2004-09/msg00024.html (17,211 bytes)
- 2. Re: Central Valley Classics Responds! (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Olson <mark.olson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 15:42:47 -0700
- -- Forwarded message -- From: owner-tigers@autox.team.net <owner-tigers@autox.team.net> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 20:40:56 -0600 Subject: BOUNCE tigers@Autox.Team.Net: Non-member submission from ["Centra
- /html/tigers/2004-09/msg00032.html (7,008 bytes)
- 3. Re: Central Valley Classics Responds! (score: 1)
- Author: "Central Valley Classics" <admin@centralvalleyclassics.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 19:42:10 -0700
- It sounds so cool when you call the group "Tigers", just like Scouts or Cadets. I have to get back to my remedial English class so that I can communicate as well as you someday. Would you please fini
- /html/tigers/2004-09/msg00033.html (19,941 bytes)
- 4. Re: Central Valley Classics Responds! (score: 1)
- Author: sosnaenergyconsulting <sosnaenergyconsulting@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 18:44:54 -0700
- Thanks for putting the whole thing out there--I must have missed something along the way. Does it strike anybody else that the second message is a lot less articulate than the first one? I'm wonderi
- /html/tigers/2004-09/msg00034.html (7,830 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu