Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*China\s+to\s+build\s+new\s+MG\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*China\s+to\s+build\s+new\s+MG\'s\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. China to build new MG's (score: 1): Author: Henry Stike <stiker2126@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:44:30 -0700 (PDT); Did anyone else hear on the news yesterday that China is going to build a plant in Oklahoma and start building the little MG again..... From CNN... Donald Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam; /html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00030.html (7,275 bytes)
2. Re: China to build new MG's (score: 1): Author: <jblair1948@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:16:06 -0400; Donald, No. I thought the hole MG China deal went down the drain: http://www.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/04/08/mgrover.history/index.html John == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Registe; /html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00031.html (7,502 bytes)
3. RE: China to build new MG's (score: 1): Author: "Daniel parrott" <parrotthead01@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:11:44 -0400; Any pictures of the new Chinese MG? Any hope for a Chinese Spitfire? Donald, No. I thought the hole MG China deal went down the drain: http://www.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/04/08/mgrover.history/index.htm; /html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00032.html (8,022 bytes)
4. Re: China to build new MG's (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:30:05 -0700; For the sake of up Spit owners, I hope NOT! == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http://www.vtr.org; /html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00033.html (7,483 bytes)
5. Re: China to build new MG's (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:28:50 EDT; Any pictures of the new Chinese MG? Any hope for a Chinese Spitfire? ==AM== Not likely, at least not in the near future; BMW owns the Triumph name! --Andy Mace *Mrs Irrelevant: Oh, is it a jet? *Man:; /html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00034.html (7,810 bytes)
6. RE: China to build new MG's (score: 1): Author: "Rarebits" <bill@rarebits4classics.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:39:09 +0100; I think technically they own the MG name too. That name was licensed to the previous company, Cheers, Bill. Rarebits4classics .......just what you've been looking for PO Box 1232 Calne Wiltshire SN1; /html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00037.html (7,880 bytes)
7. RE: China to build new MG's (score: 1): Author: "Daniel parrott" <parrotthead01@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:36:06 -0400; I was mainly interested in what a modern Spitfire would look like, using some of the same styling elements. I think technically they own the MG name too. That name was licensed to the previous compan; /html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00038.html (8,289 bytes)
8. Re: China to build new MG's (score: 1): Author: Larry Vaughan <ljvaughan@pldi.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:52:56 -0500; Plant to be built in Ardmore, OK. A drawing of the MG was on the front page of one paper. I forget which one. It showed a hard top coupe with no resemblance to the old MG's I've seen. It might be sim; /html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00039.html (7,841 bytes)
9. RE: China to build new MG's (score: 1): Author: "Joe & Lowetta" <joe@ados.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:16:35 -0700; Nope John, Just snooped around on the topic, and the story you sent out was from august of last year, and the announcement was made on Wednesday this past week that they will in fact be building the; /html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00043.html (8,520 bytes)
10. RE: China to build new MG's (score: 1): Author: "Bill Gingerich" <wrgingerich@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:36:43 -0500; FWIW, I spoke with an Economic Development guy at the Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce last week who was at the news conference last Wednesday. This is indeed happening, though I have no added detai; /html/spitfires/2006-07/msg00050.html (8,702 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]