Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chrysler\s+\&\s+the\s+Tiger\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chrysler\s+\&\s+the\s+Tiger\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Chrysler & the Tiger (score: 1): Author: Rande Bellman <rande@thecia.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:50:11 -0500; I think the urban myth that Chrysler lost interest in the Tiger because their 273 motor couldn't be adapted should go the way of the myth about the burly worker at Jensen who stood in the engine bay; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00405.html (7,871 bytes)
2. Re: Chrysler & the Tiger (score: 1): Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:19:22 -0800 (PST); Rande- I have to wonder what gave you the idea the guy standing in the engine bay was burley. It is a well known and established fact he was a very small skinny dude but he swung a very large mallet.; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00414.html (7,327 bytes)
3. Re: Chrysler & the Tiger (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:14:25 -0800; -- -- Steve Laifman Editor http://www.TigersUnited.com; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00423.html (8,141 bytes)
4. Re: Chrysler & the Tiger (score: 1): Author: Theodore Brown <tbrown@midcoast.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:04:13 -0500; Hi guys: I think Rande had it correct. It was my understanding, and I can remember back then, that one of the really important reasons for Chrysler cancelling the Tiger had to do with a bunch of new; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00449.html (8,129 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]