Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chrysler\s+bailout\/\s+was\s+Re\:\s+TR7\s+\-\s+Good\s+or\s+Bad\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chrysler\s+bailout\/\s+was\s+Re\:\s+TR7\s+\-\s+Good\s+or\s+Bad\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Chrysler bailout/ was Re: TR7 - Good or Bad? (score: 1): Author: The Richards <smrm@coastalnet.com>; Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 07:35:46 -0500; about their themselves up by me, this Mr. Lee went to Congress hat in hand and received a massive loan for Chrysler. To that august body's credit, Congress didn't really try to run Chrysler. And to M; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg00114.html (8,390 bytes)
2. Re: Chrysler bailout/ was Re: TR7 - Good or Bad? (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 08:44:25 -0600; It wasn't the Ram truck that saved Chrysler. It was that lousy 'K' car platform that they designed once and then modified for many years to bring you so many ugly Chrysler sedans in the late 80's. O; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg00123.html (8,718 bytes)
3. Chrysler bailout/ was Re: TR7 - Good or Bad? (score: 1): Author: mgb.roadster@juno.com (Larry A Hoy); Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 09:24:31 -0700; It is my understanding the Chrysler bailout was financed by private funding guaranteed by the US government. Much like the FHA and VA housing loans here in the US. During the process the US governmen; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg00131.html (8,043 bytes)
4. Re: Chrysler bailout/ was Re: TR7 - Good or Bad? (score: 1): Author: Gregory Kirk <gkirk@empirenet.com>; Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 10:22:33 -0800; Well, that is theLee Iaccoca version, what his little story omits is that while the loan was paid off early, no attempt was ever made to repay the outright grants that were also made at the same time; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg00137.html (9,017 bytes)
5. Re: Chrysler bailout/ was Re: TR7 - Good or Bad? (score: 1): Author: mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (John McEwen); Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:40:54 -0500; Hi Michael: Actually, Chrysler received a loan guarantee. It received no money from Congress. On the basis of the guarantee, money was lent, and as you have stated, paid off early. John; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg00141.html (8,696 bytes)
6. Re: Chrysler bailout/ was Re: TR7 - Good or Bad? (score: 1): Author: The Richards <smrm@coastalnet.com>; Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 13:43:29 -0500; I shoulda phrased it better. Note that I didn't actually say that Congress loaned Mopar the money;-) Lee-boy went to Congress or he didn't get the loan. It think it was an overall good example of pri; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg00142.html (8,311 bytes)
7. Re: Chrysler bailout/ was Re: TR7 - Good or Bad? (score: 1): Author: Teacher122@aol.com; Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 23:53:42 -0500 (EST); << Well, that is theLee Iaccoca version, what his little story omits is that while the loan was paid off early, no attempt was ever made to repay the outright grants that were also made at the same t; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg00185.html (8,042 bytes)
8. Re: Chrysler bailout/ was Re: TR7 - Good or Bad? (score: 1): Author: Gregory Kirk <gkirk@empirenet.com>; Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 22:07:04 -0800; Tom, I have no problem with them accepting grant monies, but I do have a problem with the image that Mr Iaccoca presents that Chrysler lifted itself by it's bootstraps after the bailout and that it c; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg00190.html (9,006 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]