Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Churchill\s+puller\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Churchill\s+puller\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Churchill puller (score: 1): Author: cak@dimebank.com (Chris Kantarjiev); Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 11:57:14 -0700; OK, several recent messages are dangerously close to stirring me out of my indolence and into remanufacture of the Churchill puller for TRs. (It doesn't seem worth doing for the Spit/GT, since TSSC m; /html/fot/1998-10/msg00071.html (7,100 bytes)
2. Re: Churchill puller (score: 1): Author: Catpusher@aol.com; Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 23:43:10 EDT; << really like to inspect an original (Hardy, maybe this will finally get me up to your place) <snip> the welcome mat is out!! a couple of questions: Is this thing really cast iron, as I've been thin; /html/fot/1998-10/msg00078.html (6,819 bytes)
3. Re: Churchill puller (score: 1): Author: Bob Lang <LANG@ISIS.MIT.EDU>; Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 11:09:26 -0400 (EDT); It sure looks like it, although it could be steel... it's not forged, the casting surface is sort of rough. Yes. around 6 - 8 inches... very thick. When you place the flange over the studs, only abou; /html/fot/1998-10/msg00091.html (11,272 bytes)
4. Re: Churchill puller (score: 1): Author: Patrick McMullen <pmcmull@ibm.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 20:38:18 -0700; A friend of mine has rebuilt several TR-6 hubs. He always freezes them for 24 hours before applying any pressure to seperate. I believe he is 5 for 5 on the success ratio. Puts them babies up there w; /html/fot/1998-10/msg00112.html (6,592 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]