Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chute\s+Forces\s+$1$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chute\s+Forces\s+$1$\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: "3liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:47:29 -0700; At the beginning of the month John Robinson left a posting about his former experience sky diving. The conclusion of that post was that he never experienced chute loads of greater than 2.7 G regardle; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00175.html (8,349 bytes)
2. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 05:23:41 -0700 (PDT); If you want to see evidence of a deployed chute spike, ask Turk for his Maxton QwikData files. Print the histograms for his front and rear potentiometers. The spike is quite evident. John Goodman ___; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00179.html (8,391 bytes)
3. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 06:34:17 -0700; Hey! I never thought of that. I have the data and there is a monsterous spike right before shutdown. And that is in a car at only 200 mph and a short tow line. A bagged stroud chute might work better; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00181.html (9,336 bytes)
4. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:03:08 -0600; This subject seems to come up every year about this time. A lot of study has been done by the streamliner gang regarding chute deployment, opening shock, tow line lengths, canopy design, size etc. W; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00184.html (9,782 bytes)
5. RE: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:37:56 -0400; I came up with a bunch of contraptions menatlly though never built any of The two that made the most sense to me where a cylinder with water, a piston and a coil spring inside. As you pull on the end; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00192.html (10,055 bytes)
6. RE: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@lubricationdynamics.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:07:28 -0500; I like the water shock best. But why do anything?; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00195.html (8,335 bytes)
7. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:49:09 EDT; Interesting --but-- have you ever tried it? Jack; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00199.html (7,916 bytes)
8. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:44:58 -0400; For us well under 400 MPH guys wouldn't some extra heavy duty rubber bands grouping the tether together help with this problem? JB -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> To; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00200.html (10,103 bytes)
9. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:44:51 EDT; CHUTES HIT HARD, ITS A GOOD FEELING! WITH A TUBE PACK I TAPE THE SHROUDS TO PREVENT CHAFING AND LESSEN THE "SPIKE" JACK; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00201.html (8,019 bytes)
10. Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: "3liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:08:53 -0700; BRS http://brsparachutes.com <http://brsparachutes.com/> has long-standing patents for a device to slow the opening of the canopy. It is a reefing ring system that fits around the shroud lines and sl; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00205.html (9,395 bytes)
11. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:28:54 -0400; I remember an energy absorbing device on a drag strip catch net that pulled a steel band that was woven through a row of pegs - A Stroud baged chute is an easier answer - What are anyones thoughts on; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00206.html (7,928 bytes)
12. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:45:11 -0400; Good old "Duct Tape". TO; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00207.html (8,500 bytes)
13. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: Ed Van Scoy <edvs@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:46:25 -0700 (PDT); John, are you serious about duct tape? I use masking tape about every foot on the shroud lines....packs easier & chute opens smoother... Seems like duct tape would be too strong....causing a "streame; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00214.html (8,757 bytes)
14. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: Higginbotham Land Speed Racing <saltrat@lubricationdynamics.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:32:13 -0500; I use one wrap of duct tape about 10 feet from the canopy.....opens very smoothly say the shoe. Skip; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00216.html (8,149 bytes)
15. Re: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:16:56 -0700; Were back to understanding the forces at work here. I think you could put 5 turns of standard (cheep) duct tape on the shroud lines and it would slow the opening by 200 - 400 milliseconds. They tried; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00218.html (8,034 bytes)
16. RE: Chute Forces (1) (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:45:34 -0500; It's all about energy; a material with little "stretch" will generate very high peak loads for a very short time. A "stretchy" material like nylon allows the load to be generated over a much longer; /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00227.html (8,404 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]