Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Civic\s+Si\s+\-\s+Classing\s+guesses\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Civic\s+Si\s+\-\s+Classing\s+guesses\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Civic Si - Classing guesses? (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 22:28:21 -0600; Anyone want to take a crack at where the new Civic Si would/should/could be classed. Seems a bit of a buzz bomb with the Vtec, but they did quite a bit with the suspension and brakes. Thoughts from a; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01003.html (7,351 bytes)
2. Re: Civic Si - Classing guesses? (score: 1): Author: "Tim Malzahn" <tmalzahn@tnmnetworks.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 23:37:23 -0600; I bet it gets classed in GS like the Integra GS-R. Almost the same power and handling. However, if it stays in ES, it might be an interesting car. Tim Malzahn 97 Integra GS-R 4 door Anyone want to ta; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01007.html (7,754 bytes)
3. Re: Civic Si - Classing guesses? (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 06:19:41 -0800 (PST); It's a bit weak compared to the Integra GS-R: Civic Si -- 160 hp@7600 rpm, 111 lb-ft@7000 rpm Integra GS-R -- 170 hp@7600 rpm, 128 lb-ft@6200 rpm But, given SCAC's conservative approach, I agree it c; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01013.html (7,645 bytes)
4. Re: Civic Si - Classing guesses? (score: 1): Author: Michael King <mapco@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 09:51:09 +0000; interesting, doesn't it. When I was running my ES 92 Civic Si Hatchback, with stock shocks and hoosier Street TD's, I was consistantly about a second behind Allen and Brolliar in the Neons. I think; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01017.html (7,715 bytes)
5. Re: Civic Si - Classing guesses? (score: 1): Author: dave <davek@urjet.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 07:51:41 -0700; and handling. However, if it stays in ES, it might be an interesting car. Or it could get classed in DS w/ the se-R's and Neons......That could be very interesting :); /html/autox/1999-01/msg01018.html (7,285 bytes)
6. Re: Civic Si - Classing guesses? (score: 1): Author: dave <davek@urjet.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 07:55:19 -0700; The Si coupe will be better than the Del-Slo...sorry! Del-Sol!! the tranny used on the del-sol was geared very high...Civic ex was just barely faster w/ 40 less horses..; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01019.html (7,948 bytes)
7. RE: Civic Si - Classing guesses? (score: 1): Author: "joe goeke" <joe_goeke@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:53:32 -0800; What does the civic weight? GS is _usually_ heavier sedans, say 2700 and --JCG Team Butt Heat GS Audi A4 Quattro; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01070.html (8,345 bytes)
8. RE: Civic Si - Classing guesses? (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:55:32 -0800 (PST); 2700 and Here's what Honda lists for Civic coupes on their web site: (all weights MT/AT except MT/CVT for the HX) Civic DX 2359/2405# Civic HX 2370/2445# Civic EX 2513/2560# Civic Si 2612/n.a. No ide; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01083.html (7,715 bytes)
9. Re: Civic Si - Classing guesses? (score: 1): Author: "Tim Malzahn" <tmalzahn@tnmnetworks.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 20:12:26 -0600; However, with the GS-R, you have to drive the thing like you are seriously mad at it. There is not much power below 6000 rpm. In fact at an event last summer, the course was so tight that I ended up; /html/autox/1999-01/msg01093.html (8,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]