Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Clairification\s+of\s+ignition\s+warning\s+light\s+question\!\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Clairification of ignition warning light question! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Gilbert <sgilbert@wpusd.k12.ca.us>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:37:53 +0000
Dear Morgan Folks, Thanks for all the replys to my FOOLISH move to change a perfectly fine Morgan from positive ground (as Mr. Lucas intended) to negative ground (so I could hook up a cell phone char
/html/morgans/2000-04/msg00006.html (8,568 bytes)

2. Re: Clairification of ignition warning light question! (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 00:26:15 -0700
The charge light I am not sure about, but 1968 TR-4s that were negative ground and used a generator also had a special voltage regulator that had a lable on it specifying that it was for negative gro
/html/morgans/2000-04/msg00007.html (9,845 bytes)

3. RE: Clairification of ignition warning light question! (score: 1)
Author: "Manfred Brown" <m-brown@dircon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 06:23:23 +0100
I've not been following this so excuse what may be a stupid question: why not just reverse the connections on the cigar lighter, if that is what you connect your phone charger to? Mine is mounted in
/html/morgans/2000-04/msg00023.html (9,326 bytes)

4. RE: Clairification of ignition warning light question! (score: 1)
Author: "Hodgkiss, Ben" <bhodgkiss@herefordshire.gov.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 09:30:34 +0100
Are you sure that one end of the ignition warning light lead isn't connected to the negative battery terminal instead of the positive? This would explain both why the ammeter works correctly and the
/html/morgans/2000-04/msg00029.html (9,761 bytes)

5. RE: Clairification of ignition warning light question! (score: 1)
Author: "Blair, John" <JBlair@scn.spawar.navy.mil>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:15:42 -0400
That is the easy solution, but has a hidden parel. If any part of the radio/cell phone, antenna, etc, comes in contact with ANY metal part of the car, you have a short and possibly a fire. I know thi
/html/morgans/2000-04/msg00030.html (10,450 bytes)

6. Re: Clairification of ignition warning light question! (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart J. Ross" <stuross@nac.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 08:21:10 -0400
There is a converter for positive ground cars that has a cigarette lighter style plug to allow those devices to be used in a Britmobile. I have one in my +4 which is in the garage so I can't find the
/html/morgans/2000-04/msg00031.html (12,261 bytes)

7. RE: Clairification of ignition warning light question! (score: 1)
Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 09:18:28 -0400
Hmm, a radar detector held in place with suction cups on a wooden-framed car. If we were not talking about Morgans, I'd say that somebody was trying to lengthen one of my legs. Radar detection in "t
/html/morgans/2000-04/msg00032.html (13,530 bytes)

8. Re: Clairification of ignition warning light question! (score: 1)
Author: Dan DiBiase <dibiase@home.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 14:57:53 -0400
I don't believe that fiberglass or wood are invisible to radar. I recall reading an article about a stealth Corvette in Car and Driver years ago, where a guy had painted his entire car with a matte-b
/html/morgans/2000-04/msg00035.html (8,240 bytes)

9. RE: Clairification of ignition warning light question! (score: 1)
Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 15:50:41 -0400
I seem to recall the article about the matte black Corvette. That's why I wonder if it could have been the metal of the engine or radiator that reflected the radar. I must admit I don't know much ab
/html/morgans/2000-04/msg00036.html (9,297 bytes)

10. Re: Clairification of ignition warning light question! (score: 1)
Author: Dan DiBiase <dibiase@home.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 17:17:46 -0400
Good point re: the baseball... I know the stuff they use in stealth planes actually absorbs the radar rays versus passing them through... I have an old detector but don't even bother with it here in
/html/morgans/2000-04/msg00037.html (8,000 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu